News & Analysis as of

Patent Infringement Patent Litigation United Kingdom

McDermott Will & Emery

Legal Lens on the Unified Patent Court | September 2024

McDermott Will & Emery on

The Unified Patent Court (UPC) is revolutionizing the way patents are enforced in Europe, and McDermott’s intellectual property team is here to help you navigate this dynamic landscape. Our Legal Lens on the Unified Patent...more

Fish & Richardson

Should the Experimental Use Exception Be Broadened?

Fish & Richardson on

On June 28, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) requested the public’s views on the current state of the common law experimental use exception to patent infringement and whether legislative action...more

McDermott Will & Emery

European UPC Issues Its First Decisions on the Merits

McDermott Will & Emery on

Franz Kaldewei GmbH & Co. KG v. Bette GmbH & Co. KG The Unified Patent Court (UPC) issued its first decision on the merits, granting the first-ever permanent injunction covering seven UPC member states. Franz Kaldewei GmbH &...more

WilmerHale

FRAND Quarterly: Navigating the Global SEP Landscape - April 2024

WilmerHale on

This marks the second issue of WilmerHale’s FRAND Quarterly: Navigating the Global SEP Landscape, a bulletin that will highlight developments about the licensing, litigation, and regulation of patents that are or are claimed...more

McDermott Will & Emery

UPC Court of Appeal Issues First Decision, Overturns Preliminary Injunction

Back in September 2023, the Unified Patent Court’s (UPC) Local Division Munich issued a preliminary injunction against the defendant in 10x Genomics, Inc. v. NanoString Technologies, Inc. On February 26, 2024, in a landmark...more

WilmerHale

FRAND Quarterly: Navigating the Global SEP Landscape - January 2024

WilmerHale on

This marks the first issue of WilmerHale’s FRAND Quarterly: Navigating the Global SEP Landscape, a bulletin that will highlight developments about the licensing, litigation, and regulation of patents that are or are claimed...more

Jones Day

Patent Marking and e-Marking in Europe: Maximizing Benefits and Avoiding Pitfalls

Jones Day on

In Short - The Background: Patent marking refers to the practice of indicating on a product that its underlying technology is protected through a patent. As an alternative to traditional patent marking, e-marking displays...more

Linda Liu & Partners

News Flash: China parallel patent infringement litigation gives Nanoco leverage in the $150million settlement with Samsung

Linda Liu & Partners on

In March, Samsung agreed to pay UK Nanotechnology Company Nanoco USD 150 million in a patent infringement dispute over patents used in QLED televisions that featured legal team from Wei Chixue Law Firm of Linda Liu Group - a...more

Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth

IP Owners Beware: The Fast Approaching European Unitary Patent System and Unified Patent Court

Background - As has been widely reported, major changes are looming for the European patent landscape. After many years of preparatory work and negotiations, Europe’s new Unified Patent Court (UPC) is expected to open for...more

Dechert LLP

UK Court of Appeal rules on the rights of licensees to bring patent infringement claims

Dechert LLP on

The UK Court of Appeal has issued its judgment in one of the latest hearings in Neurim Pharmaceuticals v Generics (UK) relating to Neurim’s insomnia drug, Circadin. The Court of Appeal ruled that an exclusive licensee has...more

A&O Shearman

Optis v Apple [2021] EWHC 2564 (Pat): Apple found to be an “unwilling licensee”

A&O Shearman on

The “unwilling licensee” issue has been a vexed one, with uncertainty as to whether such a concept exists, its relevance, and what an implementer must do to avoid becoming one. As for the concept of FRAND itself, there is no...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

High Court Clarifies Appeal Procedures Following Remote Hand Downs of Judgments

Latham & Watkins LLP on

Mr Justice Hacon finds that procedures for applying for permission to appeal are not altered by the COVID-19 Protocol. In Claydon v. Mzuri, Mr Justice Hacon of the High Court has found that the COVID-19 Protocol does not...more

JAMS

FRAND License Disputes: Litigation and ADR

JAMS on

A party to a dispute making a conscious decision whether to litigate or arbitrate does not occur as often as some might think. The decision is often made by the circumstances. If a dispute arises regarding a license or other...more

Morgan Lewis - Tech & Sourcing

UK High Court Denies DABUS Appeal

On Monday 21 September, the UK High Court (Patents) delivered its judgment on the DABUS appeal, as previously reported here by Morgan Lewis. ...more

BakerHostetler

Landmark UK Supreme Court Decision Grants UK Courts Power to Set the Global Royalty Rate for Standard Essential Patents

BakerHostetler on

On Aug. 26, 2020, the United Kingdom Supreme Court issued a decision in Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor v Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd & Anor [2020] UKSC 37 that changes the landscape for patentees seeking to...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

THE SEP WORLD IN BALANCE: UK Harmonizes with Germany’s Rejection of Implementer Hold Out

Implementer Hold Out - Another major development in global standard essential patent litigation was handed down today, as the UK Supreme Court upheld lower court rulings that forced an efficient infringer of essential...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Financial Daily Dose 1.13.2020 | Top Story: Labor Dept. Issues Stricter Joint Employer Test in New Rules

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Sunday’s release of a long-awaited Labor Department final rule on joint employment spells trouble for workers hoping to “sue large companies for wrongdoing by contractors or franchisees.” The rule reverses Obama-era policies...more

WilmerHale

The Assertion of Extraterritorial Patent Jurisdiction in Europe

WilmerHale on

US patents have some extraterritorial effect. A party can be liable for patent infringement if it supplies components of a patented invention to a foreign country to be assembled there. In WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical...more

Hogan Lovells

Standard Essential Patent Update – December 2018

Hogan Lovells on

Hogan Lovells’ Standard Essential Patent (SEP) Update reports on recent news and case decisions from jurisdictions including China, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. ...more

Jones Day

Second Medical Use Patents in Europe: Are UK and Germany Swapping Approaches?

Jones Day on

The UK Supreme Court's ruling in Warner Lambert v Actavis resulted from deliberations over the proper approach to matters relating to infringement of second medical use patent claims. The standard proposed by the UK Supreme...more

Ladas & Parry LLP

UK Supreme Court Decision In Actavis V. Eli Lilly – Doctrine Of Equivalents Recognized

Ladas & Parry LLP on

In its decision of July 12, 2017 in Actavis v. Eli Lilly, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom for the first time formally adopted the concept of a doctrine of equivalents when considering what constituted an infringement...more

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Food & Beverage Litigation Update | March 2018 #2

US, EU Near Agreement on Shellfish Trade - The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has proposed to allow the import of raw bivalve molluscan shellfish—including clams, mussels, oysters and scallops—harvested in the...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

A Seismic Shift in UK Patent Infringement Law - Actavis v. Eli Lilly

In a decision that appears to have introduced a doctrine of equivalents for the first time, the UK Supreme Court has shifted the laws on patent infringement in Actavis v. Eli Lilly UK [2017] UKSC 48. While this case...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

UK Supreme Court Breathes New Life to the Doctrine of Equivalents

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

In what is perhaps the most important development in English law of the last decade in this area of interpretation of patent claims and patent infringement, the UK Supreme Court gave new life to the doctrine of equivalents in...more

WilmerHale

Actavis v. Eli Lilly1: Back to the future - The UK Supreme Court changes the test for patent infringement

WilmerHale on

The UK Supreme Court rarely hears patent cases, and will only hear cases that it considers to be fundamentally important. The court's July 12 judgment is most significant for changing the test for infringement in the United...more

31 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide