News & Analysis as of

Patent Litigation Machine Learning

Jones Day

USPTO Extends Comment Deadline on Patent Eligible Subject Matter Guidance for AI Inventions

Jones Day on

The USPTO has extended the public comment deadline in order to afford all stakeholders an opportunity to weigh in on the subject matter eligibility of AI inventions....more

Baker Botts L.L.P.

Intellectual Property Report - August 2024

Baker Botts L.L.P. on

Be an Expert: Precedential PTAB Decision on Conclusory Expert TestimonyStutti TilwaA recent precedential decision from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) may serve as a warning for those parties who plan on relying on...more

Jones Day

USPTO Issues Patent Eligible Subject Matter Guidance for AI Inventions

Jones Day on

The Situation: Concerns that uncertain and unpredictable patent subject matter eligibility jurisprudence thwarts U.S. economic and technological advancements are especially acute in the fast advancing AI space. Stakeholders...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

101 Whack-a-Mole – Yet Another Software Patent Falls Victim to Section 101

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

In 2014, the Supreme Court upended U.S. patent law in the landmark ruling for Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International.  The Alice decision established new standards for determining whether inventions, especially those related...more

American Conference Institute (ACI)

[Event] 22nd Advanced Summit on Life Sciences - May 29th - 30th, New York, NY

Hosted by American Conference Institute, the 22nd Advanced Summit on Life Sciences Patents returns for another exciting year with curated programming that will provide practical insights on how to maximize your patent term...more

Smart & Biggar

Ghost in the machine: AI and patent protection

Smart & Biggar on

On December 20, 2023, the UK Supreme Court dismissed Dr. Stephen Thaler’s appeal from the Court of Appeal (England and Wales), finding that AI cannot be an inventor because an inventor must be a natural person1. This issue...more

Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP

Could your patent be invalid if your attorney uses AI in the drafting process?

The Federal Circuit held in Thaler v. Vidal that an “inventor” must be a human.  During the patent drafting process, the human inventors meet with the patent attorney to describe the invention.  In this meeting, the patent...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

AI cannot be an inventor of a UK Patent

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The United Kingdom Supreme Court (the ultimate appeal level in the UK legal system) has ruled in a decision of 20 December 2023 that an artificial intelligence (“AI”) system cannot be identified in a patent application as the...more

White & Case LLP

UK Supreme Court Rules Against AI Inventorship of Patents

White & Case LLP on

On December 20, 2023, the UK Supreme Court ("Court") dismissed Dr. Stephen Thaler's appeal, unanimously affirming the decision of the Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks ("Comptroller") that a machine which...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

U.K. Supreme Court Rules No Patent for AI Inventor

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.K. Supreme Court has followed the lead of U.S. courts and denied patent rights to an artificial intelligence (AI) system. The case demonstrates a global trend in the current patent law regime to deny inventorship to AI...more

MoFo Life Sciences

Five Questions After Amgen V. Sanofi

MoFo Life Sciences on

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Amgen v. Sanofi puts a spotlight on enablement of functionally defined claims. Future developments may shed light on a number of remaining questions for patent applicants. Here are five...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Can ChatGPT Draft Patent Applications?

OpenAI's prototype of ChatGPT, released at the end of November 2022, drew rapid, widespread public attention for its ability to provide articulate, human-like responses across a wide variety of knowledge domains.  Numerous...more

Smart & Biggar

2022 Highlights in Canadian Life Sciences IP and Regulatory Law

Smart & Biggar on

Below are highlights from the Rx IP’s team’s 2022 updates (see also our Top 10 Rx IP Update Reads of 2022): Contents: 1. Patent decisions on the merits 2. PMNOC Regulations: Fifth-year anniversary of major amendments,...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Federal Circuitry

Last Week In The Federal Circuit (August 1-5): An (Artificially) Intelligent Decision On Inventorship

From facial-recognition technology to voice assistants and self-driving cars, artificial intelligence these days is pretty remarkable. But according to our latest case of the week, there’s at least one thing AI can’t do: be...more

Smart & Biggar

2022 mid-year highlights in Canadian life sciences IP and regulatory law

Smart & Biggar on

In the first half of 2022, Rx IP Update reported on a number of developments in Canadian life sciences IP and regulatory law. The Rx IP Update team at Smart & Biggar has collected the top stories from January to July and...more

Fish & Richardson

Fish Post-Grant Radio: Episode #14: Tom Rozylowicz

Fish & Richardson on

This episode of Fish Post-Grant Radio, hosted by Rick Bisenius, touches on AI and Machine Learning with Tom Rozylowicz, a principal in our Washington, D.C. office. With a market that is estimated to be around $300 billion by...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Patenting Considerations for Artificial Intelligence in Biotech and Synthetic Biology – Part 2: Key Issues in Patent Subject...

In our first blog in this multi-part series, we explored key considerations for protecting artificial intelligence (“AI”) inventions in biotech and synthetic biology. In this part 2 of the series, we will examine some key...more

17 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide