News & Analysis as of

Patents Inventions POSITA

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - September 2024

Knobbe Martens on

Combining Abstract Ideas Does Not Make Them Less Abstract - In Broadband Itv, Inc. v. Amazon.Com, Inc., Appeal No. 23-1107, the Federal Circuit held that when assessing patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101, combining two...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Federal Circuit Says No Timing Requirement To Qualify As A POSITA

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Last week, in Osseo Imaging, LLC v. Planmeca USA Inc., No. 2023-1627 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 4, 2024), the Federal Circuit held that “[a]n expert need not have acquired the skill level prior to the time of the invention to be able...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Back to the Future: Expert Can Be Skilled Artisan Based on Later-Acquired Knowledge

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit clarified that a technical expert does not need to have been a person of ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) at the time of the invention. Instead, they may rely on...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Am I sunk? Where are all the safe harbors against the “on sale” bar?

In part 1 of this series, I introduced the “on sale bar” and described how a commercial sale or offer for sale can negate patentability, according to the doctrine the Supreme Court established in Pfaff v. Wells Elecs., Inc....more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Error in Prior Art Did Not Render Invention Obvious

In LG Electronics Inc. v. Immervision, Inc., the Federal Circuit held that an obvious error in a prior art reference was not considered a teaching. The court explained that a person of ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) would...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide