News & Analysis as of

Petition For Rehearing En Banc Review

Fox Rothschild LLP

En Banc Rehearing in the North Carolina Court of Appeals: A Petition for Panel Rehearing in Disguise?

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Long-time readers of this blog may remember the fun I’ve had finding photos reflecting the ups and downs of en banc rehearing in the Court of Appeals. The General Assembly first authorized en banc review in 2016, with the...more

Jones Day

Federal Circuit Denies Petition for Rehearing En Banc Filed By Cellect, LLC

Jones Day on

The Federal Circuit denied Cellect, LLC's petition for rehearing en banc of the In re Cellect case, which held that the expiration of a patent for obviousness-type double patenting ("ODP") purposes is the expiration date...more

Holtzman Vogel Baran Torchinsky & Josefiak

FEC Update with Matt Petersen: Prosecutorial Discretion and Judicial Review

Late last week, a D.C. Circuit Court panel (which included Chief Judge Srinivasan) again reiterated that Federal Election Commission (FEC) complaint dismissals premised on prosecutorial discretion are not subject to judicial...more

McDermott Will & Emery

This Week in 340B: March 2023

This weekly series provides brief summaries to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets on more than 40 340B cases to provide you with a quick...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Another Published Rehearing Denial

Fox Rothschild LLP on

If you’ve regularly read my blog posts here over the past few years (in other words, if you are my mom), you will know that I find Fourth Circuit published denials of petitions for rehearing to be of particular interest. ...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Ninth Circuit Defers Decision on Petition for Rehearing Regarding AB 51

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Last year, a divided Ninth Circuit panel found that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) did not completely preempt Assembly Bill (AB) 51, California’s ban on mandatory arbitration agreements. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce then...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Update on Hunstein Decision: Eleventh Circuit Vacates Original Panel Decision

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued its initial opinion on Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc., No. 8:19-cv-00983-TPB-TGW on April 21, 2021. As previously discussed in a...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

En Banc Review Results in Equally Divided Fourth Circuit (Again)

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The world of Fourth Circuit en banc review has provided much fodder for my postings on this blog (See, e.g., here, here, here, here). On Monday, the Court released another blog-worthy en banc opinion when it affirmed per...more

Snell & Wilmer

Hunstein v. Preferred Collection & Management Services, Inc.— Eleventh Circuit Panel Doubles Down Pending En Banc Rehearing...

Snell & Wilmer on

In an unusual move, an Eleventh Circuit panel doubled down on its prior, industry-disrupting decision that a debt collector may violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) by transmitting private information to a...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

U.S. Chamber of Commerce Asks Ninth Circuit to Reconsider Ruling Upholding California’s Mandatory Employment Arbitration Ban

The battle concerning California’s Assembly Bill (AB) No. 51 - the law seeking effectively to ban mandatory employment arbitration in California - continues to rage. On October 20, 2021, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Might the Rule of Necessity be Necessary After All?

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Two weeks ago I blogged on the unique situation facing the Fourth Circuit in the high-profile Dylann Roof case after all of the judges of the Court recused themselves from hearing his appeal. Since that post, there have been...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

“Rule Of Necessity” Not Necessary For Federal Circuit Courts

Fox Rothschild LLP on

An interesting recusal issue recently faced the Supreme Court of North Carolina, requiring the Court to invoke the “Rule of Necessity” in order to hear a high-profile case on North Carolina teachers’ retirement plans. As...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

And Then There Were None–Court Of Appeals’ First En Banc Case Vanishes

Fox Rothschild LLP on

A month ago, I excitedly reported that the North Carolina Court of Appeals had granted its first motion for rehearing en banc. Turns out that the en banc party invitations were for naught. In a special order entered...more

Haug Partners LLP

Has the Federal Circuit Just Put the Final Nail in the Coffin of Broad Functional Genus Claims?

Haug Partners LLP on

July 1, 2021 In a development having significant ramifications for many biopharma companies, the Federal Circuit has denied Amgen’s petition for rehearing en banc a decision invalidating a genus patent covering its antibody...more

Burr & Forman

Eleventh Circuit Withholds Mandate in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc.

Burr & Forman on

On June 14, 2021, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a one-line order stating that the Court was withholding issuance of the mandate in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc....more

Locke Lord LLP

New Texas Rules Clarify When Parties May File a Motion for En Banc Reconsideration

Locke Lord LLP on

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure (TRAP) 49 governs the filing of motions for rehearing and motions for en banc reconsideration in the courts of appeals. For some time, litigants and courts have labored to understand the...more

Snell & Wilmer

Hunstein v. Preferred Collection & Mgmt. Servs., Inc. – Debt Collector Looks to Rehearing for Relief in Landmark Eleventh Circuit...

Snell & Wilmer on

“A may not share information about B with C.” In response to this simple yet dramatic holding at the heart of an Eleventh Circuit case of first impression regarding the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA), appellant...more

Haug Partners LLP

Can Biopharma Functional Genus Patent Claims Be Resuscitated?

Haug Partners LLP on

An en banc rehearing petition to the Federal Circuit seeks to breathe life back into the widespread practice of patenting a genus of compounds by claiming their common functional characteristics. This claiming practice was...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Federal Circuitry

The Lifespan of a Rehearing Petition

You’ve lost your case before a Federal Circuit panel and you file a rehearing petition. When can you expect good news (or at least some news…)? Timing of rehearing decisions - For a rehearing petitioner, the threshold...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Federal Circuitry

Know Your En Banc Petition Process—How An En Banc Petition In GlaxoSmithKline v. Teva Led To A New Panel Argument Without Apparent...

Although argument week isn’t until next week, the Federal Circuit heard oral argument today in two cases. One was rescheduled from earlier this month for medical reasons. But the other, GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Teva...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Seventh Circuit Holds That Federal Military Leave Statute Might Mandate Paid Leave

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Employers—particularly those in Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin—should revisit their military leave policies in light of the Seventh Circuit’s holding in White v. United Airlines Inc., No. 19-2546 (Feb. 3, 2021), that failure...more

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

Still No Same Party Joinder and Joinder of New Issues through 35 U.S.C. § 315(c)

The Federal Circuit reconfirmed its interpretation of the IPR joinder rules of 35 U.S.C. § 315(c) after the panel’s rehearing in Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLC, No. 2018-1400, 2020 WL 5267975 (Fed. Cir. Sept....more

Holland & Knight LLP

Federal Circuit Narrows its Prior Decision; Court is Still Torn on Section 101 Patent Eligibility

Holland & Knight LLP on

Following a combined petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc filed by patent owner American Axle, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has modified its earlier opinion. In that earlier decision – described...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Federal Circuitry

Agreeing to Disagree, en Banc Style: How Often Do Judges Dissent From Denial of Rehearing En Banc?

As we mentioned in one of our previous posts, the Federal Circuit recently denied a long-pending petition for rehearing en banc in American Axle & Manufacturing v. Neapco Holdings, a Section 101 case.  More than 8 months...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

American Axle & Mfg. v. Neapco Holdings LLC (Fed. Cir. 2019)

Federal Circuit (Again) Hands Down Revised Opinion in Response to Petition for Rehearing - Recently the Federal Circuit has begun a practice of withdrawing an original opinion and handing down a substitute opinion in...more

96 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide