News & Analysis as of

Pharmaceutical Industry Novartis Patents

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. MSN Pharms. Inc. - Entresto® (sacubitril/valsartan)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. MSN Pharms. Inc., Civ. No. 20-MD-2930-RGA, 2024 WL 3756787 (D. Del. Aug. 12, 2024)....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Hetero USA Inc. - Entresto® (sacubitril/valsartan)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Hetero USA Inc., Civ. No. 20-md-2930-RGA, 2024 WL 3757086 (D. Del. Aug. 12, 2024)....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Becerra - Entresto® (sacubitril/valsartan)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Becerra, No. 24-CV-02234 (DLF), 2024 WL 3823270 (D.D.C. Aug. 13, 2024) (Friedrich, J.)....more

Venable LLP

The First Biosimilar Disputes at the Unified Patent Court (UPC)

Venable LLP on

As the era of biologics and biosimilar litigations heats up in the United States, Europe’s Unified Patent Court (UPC) is also taking center stage with the first two biosimilar disputes filed in March and April....more

Polsinelli

Regeneron v Novartis and Vetter: Walker Process Client Update

Polsinelli on

In an appeal that attracted a dozen amici, including the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, five states, and the District of Columbia, the Second Circuit gave the Walker Process antitrust doctrine a shot in...more

Fish & Richardson

District of Delaware Finds Non-Orange Book-Listed Patents Subject to the Same Pleading Standard as Listed Patents in ANDA...

Fish & Richardson on

As part of the Hatch-Waxman Act, given the lack of information on the allegedly infringing product, courts have found that patentees can satisfy the pleading requirements of Twombly/Iqbal without having access to the accused...more

Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC

The Role of Patents in Prescription Drugs

Americans spend on average about $1,300 per person per year on prescription drugs, which represents only about 13.3% of the total paid-for drugs in the US. Private insurers, Medicare, and Medicaid pay another 81.8%. ...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Newsletter - January 2022 (Chinese)

Knobbe Martens on

避而不谈可能支持否定性权利要求限定 - 在 Novartis Pharmaceuticals 诉 Accord Healthcare Inc. 一案(上诉案件编号:21- 1070)中,联邦巡回上诉法院认为,一项对药物“速效剂量”避而不谈的专利申请,为要求不存在此类剂量的否定 性权利要求限制提供了书面说明支持。 ...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Newsletter - January 2022 (Japanese)

Knobbe Martens on

記述がないことがクレームの否定的限定のサポートと解釈できる場合がある Federal Circuit は、Novartis Pharmaceuticals v. Accord Healthcare Inc. (Appeal No. 21-1070) に おいて、薬剤の「初回負荷用量」についての記述がない特許出願は、そのような用量がないことを要 求するクレームの否定的限定に記述によるサポートを提供していることになると判示した。 ...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - January 2022

Knobbe Martens on

January 2022 Federal Circuit Newsletter (Japanese) January 2022 Federal Circuit Newsletter (Chinese)  Silence May Support Negative Claim Limitation In Novartis Pharmaceuticals v. Accord Healthcare Inc. Appeal No. 21-1070, the...more

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

PTAB Agrees to Review Novartis’ Patent for an Ophthalmic Injection Syringe

On October 26, 2021, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) granted Regeneron’s petition to institute an inter partes review (IPR) of Novartis’s patent U.S. Pat. No. 9,220,631 (“the ’631 patent”), which covers a pre-filled...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis Pharms. Corp. V. Accord Healthcare INC.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Accord Healthcare Inc., No. 18-1043-KAJ (D. Del. August 10, 2020) (Jordan, J.)... Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Gilenya® (fingolimod); U.S. Patent No. 9,187,405 (“the ’405...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Piramal Healthcare US Ltd. v. Novartis Pharms. Corp.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Piramal Healthcare US Ltd. v. Novartis Pharms. Corp., No. 19-12651 (SRC), 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38849 (D.N.J. Mar. 5, 2020) (Chesler, J.)....more

Troutman Pepper

Article III Standing Strikes Again

Troutman Pepper on

Argentum Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., Appeal No. 2018-2273 (Fed. Cir., April 23, 2020). Argentum and other petitioners filed IPRs against Novartis’ patent related to methods of treating...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

CAR T-Cell Therapy Takes Off and Brings on Patent Litigation

CAR T-Cell therapy, a new biologic therapy, is taking off. As companies continue to develop this new and promising therapy, patent litigation inevitably follows.  ...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Accord Healthcare Inc.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Accord Healthcare Inc., C.A. No. 18-1043-LPS, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104969 (D. Del. June 24, 2019) (Stark, J.)....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Accord Healthcare Inc.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Accord Healthcare Inc., C.A. No. 18-1043-LPS, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101106 (D. Del. June 17, 2019) (Stark, J.)....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis Pharma Co. v. West-Ward Pharms. Int’l

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis Pharma Co. v. West-Ward Pharms. Int’l, No. 2018-1434, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 14122 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2019) (Circuit Judges Stoll, Plager, and Clevenger presiding; Opinion by Stoll, J.) (Appeal from D. Del.,...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Int'l (Fed. Cir. 2019)

The Federal Circuit exhibited the current status of its obviousness jurisprudence in affirming the District Court's determination that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,410,131 were obvious in a decision handed down...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis AG v. Ezra Ventures LLC

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis AG v. Ezra Ventures LLC, Fed. Cir. No. 2017-2284, 2018 U.S App. LEXIS 34459 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 7, 2018) (Circuit Judges Moore, Chen, and Hughes presiding; Opinion by Chen, J.) (Appeal from D. Del., Stark,...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis Pharms. Corp v. Breckenridge Pharm. Inc.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp v. Breckenridge Pharm. Inc., No. 2017-2173, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 34462 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 7, 2018) (Circuit Judges Prost, Wallach, and Chen; Opinion by Chen, J.) (Appeal from D. Del., Andrews,...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Federal Circuit Says No OTDP Between Novartis Patents That Straddle URAA

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc., Novartis scored another obviousness-type double patenting (OTDP) win when the Federal Circuit held that a post-URAA child patent could not be cited as an...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. West-Ward Pharms. Int’l Ltd.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. West-Ward Pharms. Int’l Ltd., 15-cv-474-RGA, 2017 U.S. Dist. Lexis 205600 (D. Del. Dec. 14, 2017) (Andrews, J.)....more

Hogan Lovells

Hogan Lovells Moscow Life Sciences team secures major win in a precedent patent case for Novartis against a generic producer in...

Hogan Lovells on

Led by partner Natalia Gulyaeva, the Hogan Lovells Moscow team represented Novartis in a precedent case for pharma business proving that one can obtain an injunction using patent rights against a generic in Russia before the...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

More on Venue -- Plexxikon v. Novartis Pharmaceutical Corp. (N.D. Cal. 2017)

The sequel to the original summer blockbuster movie, Jaws, had as a tagline "Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water." This sentiment can describe much of U.S. patent law over the last decade and a half,...more

65 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide