News & Analysis as of

Today's Popular Updates › Preliminary Injunctions

A repository for the most well-read content on JD Supra at any given time, along with occasional roundups of popular content by specific topic. Also stop by for monthly recaps of hot articles for the previous... more +
A repository for the most well-read content on JD Supra at any given time, along with occasional roundups of popular content by specific topic. Also stop by for monthly recaps of hot articles for the previous thirty days. less -
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Update: FTC’s Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Set Aside

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on

On May 7, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a Final Rule that renders invalid non-compete clauses in standard employment agreements. 16 C.F.R. § 910. On August 20, 2024, the United States District Court for the...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

United States District Court Blocks FTC's Final Rule Banning Non-Compete Agreements

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,... on

On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced the “Final Non-Compete Clause Rule” banning most post-employment non-compete clauses between employers and employees. The final rule was set to take effect on...more

McAfee & Taft

It’s the final countdown - Court ponders FTC non-compete rule with employer implementation deadline just days away

McAfee & Taft on

With just two weeks to go before the Federal Trade Commission’s nationwide ban on non-compete agreements is set to go into effect, and with a Texas federal court still deciding whether to block the rule from going into effect...more

Mintz - Employment Viewpoints

Federal Court in Florida Issues Another Limited Preliminary Injunction Against the FTC’s Non-Compete Rule

Mintz - Employment Viewpoints on

On August 14th, a second federal judge, this time out of the Middle District of Florida, temporarily blocked the FTC’s rule banning non-compete agreements, but only as to the named plaintiff in that case. In Properties of...more

Benesch

The FTC Rule To Ban Non-Competes is (Maybe) 30 Days Away - What You Need To Know and What You (May) Want To Do

Benesch on

The hot mess known as the FTC Rule to Ban Non-Competes (“Rule”) continues to get hotter and messier as two Federal District Courts issue conflicting opinions. This conflict between the Federal Courts will not be resolved...more

Royer Cooper Cohen Braunfeld LLC

FTC’s Non-Compete Ban Effective Date Nears, PA Judge Denies Preliminary Injunction

Royer Cooper Cohen Braunfeld LLC on

With the effective date of the FTC’s ban on non-competes looming, a federal Judge in Pennsylvania declines to issue a preliminary injunction.  A federal judge in Pennsylvania recently declined to enter an injunction...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Preparing for Compliance Crunch as FTC's Noncompete Ban Nears

Fenwick & West LLP on

As we previously reported, on April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) adopted a final rule banning post-employment noncompete agreements nationwide, with limited exceptions related to the sale of a business and any...more

SEC Compliance Consultants, Inc. (SEC³)

Regulatory Roundup for July 2024

SEC Compliance Consultants, Inc. (SEC³) on

SEC Loses in ALJ Case, DOL’s Latest Fiduciary Rule Put on Hold, and SEC Reconsiders AI and Custody Rule Proposals - Welcome to our July Regulatory Roundup, where we provide a quick look at the latest regulatory developments....more

Morgan, Brown & Joy, LLP

The U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies the Legal Standard for the NLRB Seeking Preliminary Injunctions Against Employers

Morgan, Brown & Joy, LLP on

On June 13, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued Starbucks v. McKinney,1 which clarifies the legal standard governing temporary injunctions sought by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) against employers alleged...more

Venable LLP

SCOTUS Confirms NLRB Not Entitled to Deferential Standard for Preliminary Injunctions

Venable LLP on

In Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney, 602 U.S. ____ (2024) (hereafter, "Starbucks"), the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) recently resolved a circuit split to clarify that if the National Labor Relations Board (the Board) seeks a...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Update Regarding FTC’s Ban on Non-Compete Agreements

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on

On May 7, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a Final Rule that renders invalid non-compete clauses in standard employment agreements. 16 C.F.R. § 910. On July 3, 2024, the United States District Court for the...more

Sunstein LLP

Coping With the FTC Ban on Non-Competition Agreements

Sunstein LLP on

On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission issued its long-expected non-compete ban (the “Rule”). The Rule, which is scheduled to go into effect on September 4, 2024, will ban nearly all non-competes across the country....more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Pressing Pause: Explanations and Next Steps for Title IX Administrators Following Preliminary Injunctions

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP on

In the past week, two U.S. District Court judges have issued preliminary injunctions halting implementation of the recently-released 2024 Title IX final rule....more

Clark Hill PLC

Supreme Court Issues Employer-Friendly Decision Regarding the Standard to Apply to Requests for Section 10(j) Injunctive Relief...

Clark Hill PLC on

On June 13, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-awaited ruling in Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney. In Starbucks, the Supreme Court clarified that the traditional four-factor test courts apply to requests for...more

Troutman Pepper

FTC and a Coalition of Nine AGs Sue to Block Kroger’s Proposed $24.6B Acquisition of Albertsons

Troutman Pepper on

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and a coalition of nine state attorneys general (AG) filed a lawsuit on February 26, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon seeking a preliminary injunction to stall Kroger...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

California Court Denies DFPI’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against OppFi

Ballard Spahr LLP on

In a lengthy (65-page) order, the California Superior Court in Los Angeles has issued an extremely important decision upholding the legitimacy of bank-model online lending by denying a motion for preliminary injunction filed...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Enforcement of California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Is Put on Ice — for Now

Fenwick & West LLP on

On September 18, 2023, a U.S. District Court judge in the Northern District of California granted a preliminary injunction enjoining California’s attorney general from enforcing California’s California Age-Appropriate Design...more

McDermott Will & Emery

The UPC Means Business: Patentee Wins Preliminary Injunction

McDermott Will & Emery on

The Unified Patent Court’s (UPC) Local Division Munich has granted a preliminary injunction in favor of 10x Genomics, preventing NanoString Technologies, Inc. from selling its CosMx Spatial Molecular Imager (SMI) instruments...more

BakerHostetler

Another Setback for the FTC in Microsoft and Activision Blizzard Proposed Merger

BakerHostetler on

This past Tuesday, July 11, a federal judge ruled against the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) request to the District Court of Northern California to issue a preliminary injunction against Microsoft’s proposed $69 billion...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

District Court Grants Preliminary Injunction against MBDA Business Centers, Finding Unconstitutional Discrimination

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC on

In March of 2023, Christian Bruckner, Jeffrey Nuziard, and Matthew Piper filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth Division), Jeffery Nuziard, et. al. v. Minority Business...more

Bodman

Sixth Circuit Upholds Non-Compete Agreement Based on “Flexible Language” in Preliminary Injunction

Bodman on

A recent Sixth Circuit decision upholding an employer’s non-compete agreement with a former employee highlights the need for legal counsel to craft preliminary injunction language in such matters which reflects the unique...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

The Contractor Vaccine Mandate is Back?

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

On Friday, August 26, the Eleventh Circuit published the long-awaited decision in the government’s appeal of a nationwide injunction halting the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for government contractors and subcontractors. Although...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Thales DIS AIS Deutschland USA LLC (Fed. Cir. 2022)

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

The Federal Circuit today affirmed a decision by the District Court denying defendant Thales DIS AIS Deutschland USA's motion for preliminary injunction to prevent patentee plaintiff Koninklijke Philips N.V. from obtaining an...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Updates to Task Force Guidance | District Courts Follow Different Reasoning to Hold Executive Order 14042 Invalid: Circuit Courts...

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

The fast and furious Jenga game over when and with which federal vaccine mandate a company must comply might finally have reached a turning point. On January 13, 2022, the Supreme Court issued dual per curiam opinions in...more

Stinson - Government Contracting Matters

Government Contractor Vaccine Mandate Still Stayed Despite Government Attempts to Overturn

Stinson - Government Contracting Matters on

The saga continues.  In prior alerts, we have been providing updates and analysis regarding continuing practical and legal challenges to implementing the President’s Path Out of the Pandemic plan, and in particular, the...more

101 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 5
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide