News & Analysis as of

Prohibition Applications

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

What Employers Need to Know About Washington's New Prohibitions on Searching Employee Vehicles

Washington employers may no longer unjustifiably search employees' privately owned vehicles located on work premises—including garages or parking lots (or on access roads leading thereto)—according to a new Washington law,...more

Harris Beach PLLC

New York Adopts New Regulations on Prohibition of Corporal Punishment, Aversive Interventions, Prone Restraint and Seclusion

Harris Beach PLLC on

Under New York’s law and regulations, there are several well-settled guiding principles for physically interacting with students with disabilities: corporal punishment is prohibited; the use of aversive interventions has been...more

Smart & Biggar

Apotex’s section 8 claim for Apo-Atomoxetine dismissed

Smart & Biggar on

On March 30, 2023, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed Apotex’s claim under section 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (PMNOC Regulations) relating to Apo-Atomoxetine (Lilly’s...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

The New York Convention Overpowers the McCarran-Ferguson Act and Washington State Law Prohibition of Arbitration Clauses in...

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The Ninth Circuit held on August 12, in CLMS Management, that the New York Convention requires enforcement of an arbitration clause in an insurance policy issued by a foreign insurer to a U.S. policyholder, notwithstanding a...more

Carlton Fields

Round and Round – Will 2020 Bring the End to Inconsistent Anti-Rebating Prohibitions?

Carlton Fields on

Since mid-2018, the NAIC’s Innovation and Technology (EX) Task Force (Innovation TF) has been considering how state anti-rebating laws impede insurers and producers’ ability to offer innovative products and services to...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court finds invalidity allegations relating to patent for metformin formulations not justified

Smart & Biggar on

On March 8, 2019, Justice Fothergill granted Valeant Canada’s application for an order prohibiting the Minister of Health from issuing a notice of compliance to Generic Partners for its generic version of Valeant’s GLUMETZA,...more

Smart & Biggar

Apotex not permitted to plead promise-based invalidity grounds in Ontario section 8 lansoprazole action

Smart & Biggar on

This motion arose in the context of a section 8 action in which Apotex claims damages for delay in the issuance of its notice of compliance for its generic lansoprazole product (Takeda's PREVACID), due to prohibition...more

Smart & Biggar

Rx IP Update - September 2018

Smart & Biggar on

Certificate of Supplementary Protection Regime: First Anniversary Update - September 21, 2018 marked the first anniversary of the certificate of supplementary protection (CSP) regime. CSPs, which provide an additional...more

Smart & Biggar

Eli Lilly’s EFFIENT combination use patent found obvious

Smart & Biggar on

On July 13, 2018, the Federal Court dismissed Eli Lilly’s application for a prohibition order, finding that Apotex’s allegation of obviousness of Patent No. 2,432,644 (644 Patent) was justified: Eli Lilly Canada Inc v Apotex...more

Smart & Biggar

No Section 8 Liability for Valid and Infringed Patent in NEXIUM Proceeding

Smart & Biggar on

What happens when a patentee is unsuccessful in a prohibition application under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) (PMNOC) Regulations against a generic entrant, but subsequently prevails in an infringement action...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide