News & Analysis as of

Proposition 65 Comment Period Retailers

BCLP

More Changes Under Consideration For Prop. 65 Short-Form Warnings

BCLP on

The California agency that administers Proposition 65 is considering further revisions to the regulations governing the use and format of the short-form warning....more

Hogan Lovells

California update: OEHHA extends comment period

Hogan Lovells on

California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) is extending the public comment period for its proposal that lays out what constitutes a Proposition 65 exposure that would require warnings for listed...more

Buchalter

Amendments to Proposition 65’s “Downstream” Warning Procedures would include the full Distribution Chain

Buchalter on

California’s “Proposition 65” requires manufacturers and others in the chain of distribution to warn consumers before causing them to be exposed to a list of almost 900 chemicals “known to the State of California to cause...more

Lewitt Hackman

Prop 65: California May Change Up Chain of Commerce Responsibility

Lewitt Hackman on

Proposition 65, a/k/a the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, has been under fire since the law was first enacted....more

Downey Brand LLP

OEHHA Proposes Amendments to Prop. 65 Reproductive Toxicity Sampling Requirements for Food Products; New Prop. 65 Regulations for...

Downey Brand LLP on

Last month, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) proposed amendments to clarify Proposition 65 reproductive toxicity sampling requirements for food products. California’s Proposition 65, also known as...more

BCLP

Coffee Defendants Likely To Seek Stay of Prop. 65 Action Following OEHHA’s Proposal to Exempt Coffee From Warning Requirement

BCLP on

Defendants in the Proposition 65 case against Starbucks and numerous other coffee manufacturers and retailers have indicated that they intend to file a motion to stay that action following a proposal by the California agency...more

Hogan Lovells

Proposed OEHHA Regulation Declares No Significant Risk of Listed Proposition 65 Chemicals in Coffee

Hogan Lovells on

On Friday, June 15th, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) announced a proposed regulation clarifying that exposures to Proposition 65 chemicals in coffee do not pose a significant cancer...more

Downey Brand LLP

California Proposes Regulation that Proposition 65 Cancer Warnings Are Not Required for Coffee

Downey Brand LLP on

On June 15, 2018, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) proposed a new regulation to help clarify that Proposition 65 cancer warnings are not required for coffee products. OEHHA’s proposed action is...more

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

Prop. 65 Warning Requirement for BPA Takes Effect May 11

The California Proposition 65 warning requirement for Bisphenol-A (BPA) takes effect on May 11, 2016. After May 10, products that contain BPA sold in California without a Prop. 65 warning could subject retailers,...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide