News & Analysis as of

Proposition 65 Comment Period Toxic Exposure

BCLP

More Changes Under Consideration For Prop. 65 Short-Form Warnings

BCLP on

The California agency that administers Proposition 65 is considering further revisions to the regulations governing the use and format of the short-form warning....more

Miller Nash LLP

Proposed Prop 65 Pose Increased Litigation Risks

Miller Nash LLP on

California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has proposed changes to the short form warnings currently permitted by Proposition 65. These changes have the potential to greatly raise the cost of doing...more

Downey Brand LLP

Proposition 65: Legal and Technical Implications of Listing PFOA as a Carcinogen

Downey Brand LLP on

On March 19, 2021, California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) released a Notice of Intent (NOI) to list perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) as a carcinogen under Proposition 65 via the Authoritative...more

Morgan Lewis

California Moves on PFOA, PFOS, and Other PFAS Under Proposition 65

Morgan Lewis on

The California Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) recently took steps pursuant to the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, better known as Proposition...more

Perkins Coie

California Regulators Propose Tailored Proposition 65 Warnings for Cannabis Products

Perkins Coie on

On March 19, 2021, California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) announced proposed regulations that would significantly affect the warning requirements for products that cause exposure to cannabis...more

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

California Proposes to Minimize Use of Prop 65 Short-Form Warning

A popular option for satisfying Proposition 65 warning requirements, the so-called “short-form” warning, is likely to be significantly curtailed in light of a January 8th proposal from the California Office of Environmental...more

Hogan Lovells

California update: OEHHA extends comment period

Hogan Lovells on

California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) is extending the public comment period for its proposal that lays out what constitutes a Proposition 65 exposure that would require warnings for listed...more

ArentFox Schiff

Alerts Newsletter: This California Warning Might Cause Alarm – or Apathy

ArentFox Schiff on

The discussion about including the most commonly used drug in the US has once again raised questions about the value of Proposition 65 warnings to consumers. Environmental advocates say the law has compelled companies to...more

Lewitt Hackman

Prop 65: California May Change Up Chain of Commerce Responsibility

Lewitt Hackman on

Proposition 65, a/k/a the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, has been under fire since the law was first enacted....more

Downey Brand LLP

OEHHA Proposes Amendments to Prop. 65 Reproductive Toxicity Sampling Requirements for Food Products; New Prop. 65 Regulations for...

Downey Brand LLP on

Last month, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) proposed amendments to clarify Proposition 65 reproductive toxicity sampling requirements for food products. California’s Proposition 65, also known as...more

Hogan Lovells

Proposed OEHHA Regulation Declares No Significant Risk of Listed Proposition 65 Chemicals in Coffee

Hogan Lovells on

On Friday, June 15th, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) announced a proposed regulation clarifying that exposures to Proposition 65 chemicals in coffee do not pose a significant cancer...more

Lewitt Hackman

Killer Coffee? California May Exempt Coffee Industry from Prop 65 Warning Requirements

Lewitt Hackman on

We told you about the lawsuit brought against nearly 100 food industry companies regarding the lack of Prop 65 warnings in restaurants and stores selling coffee. The problem is the potential presence of acrylamide when coffee...more

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

Prop. 65 Warning Requirement for BPA Takes Effect May 11

The California Proposition 65 warning requirement for Bisphenol-A (BPA) takes effect on May 11, 2016. After May 10, products that contain BPA sold in California without a Prop. 65 warning could subject retailers,...more

Stoel Rives LLP

California Doubles Down on Proposition 65 Regulations; OEHHA Issues Pre-Regulatory Proposals That Harm Existing Defenses

Stoel Rives LLP on

Late last week, California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”) released several new pre-regulatory draft proposals regarding Proposition 65 (“Prop 65”). With one possible exception, the pre-regulatory...more

14 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide