Protected Activity, Appeals, Breach of Duty

LLC Member Acting for LLC Without Authority Is Not “Protected Activity” Under California’s Anti-SLAPP Statute

Patton Sullivan Brodehl LLP on 6/26/2024

California’s anti-SLAPP statute (Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16) aims to protect defendants from meritless lawsuits designed to chill “protected activity” — i.e., the exercise of rights of petition (litigation) or...more

Diversion of LLC Funds Is Not “Protected Activity” Under California’s Anti-SLAPP Statute

Patton Sullivan Brodehl LLP on 10/17/2022

California’s anti-SLAPP statute (Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16) aims to protect defendants from meritless lawsuits designed to chill “protected activity” — i.e., the exercise of rights of petition or free speech on...more

Anti-Slapp Statute Does Not Apply To Allegations That Insurer Improperly Refused To Provide Cumis Counsel

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on 10/29/2019

Miller Marital Deduction Trust v. Zurich American Insurance Company, — P.3d –, 2019 WL 5304862; First Appellate District Court of Appeal, Division Three, Case No. A155398 (October 21, 2019). In Miller Marital Deduction...more

Protected Activity › Appeals › Breach of Duty

LLC Member Acting for LLC Without Authority Is Not “Protected Activity” Under California’s Anti-SLAPP Statute

Diversion of LLC Funds Is Not “Protected Activity” Under California’s Anti-SLAPP Statute

Anti-Slapp Statute Does Not Apply To Allegations That Insurer Improperly Refused To Provide Cumis Counsel

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"