Podcast - Ohio State Senator Has a Bone to Pick with Court Ruling on Boneless Wings
State AG Pulse | The State AG: Both Advocate & Influencer
State AG Pulse | Swinging Through the Rust Belt, the Sun Belt and the South
Emerging Technology in the FY24 NDAA
El juicio presidencial en Colombia con Rossi Cruz
2024 Elections: The Race for the White House and Congress
Podcast: A Conversation with Andy Rotherham on Hot Topics in Education for 2023
Podcast - An Update on the Renewable Fuel Standard Final Rule
Stroock Presents: GOAT Town, Episode 2: “Bringing Some POP(S) to New York City Blocks”
2022 Midterm Election Update: Which Party Will Control the House and Senate?
Podcast: A Deep Dive into Consortia with Dan Sennott and Stephanie Halcrow
Since the recent Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade, companies have been impacted nationwide and have several new legal angles to consider as it relates to their employees and their business
The Art of Making Policy
Orrick Public Policy Podcast #26 – A Conversation with the Minnesota State Senate Majority Leader Jeremy Miller
Monthly Minute | ESG—Integrating Public Policy Engagement
A Different Kind of Advocacy | Amy & Steve Bresnen | Texas Appellate Law Podcast
Season One Wrap-Up
Podcast - Earmarks: A Conversation with Quorum and PP&R Practice Leader Rich Gold
Podcast: A Conversation with Attorney General Aaron Ford
In Savage v. Township of Neptune, et al., (A-2-23, decided May 7, 2024), the New Jersey Supreme Court analyzed and invalidated a non-disparagement provision included in a settlement agreement against a plaintiff alleging...more
In a recent unanimous decision, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that non-disparagement provisions in settlement agreements or employment agreements are against public policy and unenforceable if they seek to bar speech...more
Injuries to a woman who heroically jumped in a canal to save a neighbor’s dog were not considered viable as a cause of action under the state’s rescue doctrine. See Ann Samolyk v. Dorothy Berthe, III, No. A-16-21 (085946)...more
On June 4, 2019, in a win for New Jersey residents and life insurance companies with policies underwritten in New Jersey, the Supreme Court of New Jersey took a stand against Stranger-Originated Life Insurance (STOLI)...more
The New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision forbids employers from contractually shortening the two-year limitations period under the state’s Law Against Discrimination. In a decision issued on June 15 that reversed two...more
On June 15, 2016, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Sergio Rodriguez v. Raymours Furniture Company, Inc., in which it addressed whether the two-year statute of limitations under the New Jersey...more
Seyfarth Synopsis: The Supreme Court of New Jersey rules that employers may not shorten the statute of limitations for claims of discrimination under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination via private contract. The...more