News & Analysis as of

Puffery Marketing NAD

BakerHostetler

Drink It In: NAD Showers Us with Another ‘Best’ Claim Case

BakerHostetler on

When it rains, it pours! We just wrote about the National Advertising Division’s (NAD) beef jerky case finding that most claims of “clearly better” were boastful puffs and not comparative claims. But before we fully digested...more

BakerHostetler

A Meaty New Puffery Case to Sink Your Teeth Into

BakerHostetler on

It’s the age-old banter between the marketing team and the marketing lawyers. The song and dance goes something like this...more

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

NAD Considers Whether ​“Better” and ​“Best” Claims are Puffery

Royal Oak sells Super Size charcoal briquets that are 50% bigger than the briquets sold by certain competitors. Royal Oak advertises that ​“a bigger briquet is a better briquet” and that the briquets provide ​“the best...more

American Conference Institute (ACI)

[Event] 7th Annual Forum on Advertising Claims Substantiation - February 8th - 9th, New York, NY

While the modalities of advertising may change, advertising’s core tenant of claims substantiation remains an unwavering constant. As such, legal and regulatory professionals in marketing and advertising set their calendars...more

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Best Guesses for “Best” Claims

If you want to advertise that something is the “best,” do you need substantiation? Or can you rely on a puffery argument? Although the answer depends on context, one paragraph in a recent NAD decision seems to conflict with...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide