News & Analysis as of

Redistricting Voting Rights Act Gerrymandering

Snell & Wilmer

Supreme Court Clarifies Evidentiary Contours of Racial and Political Gerrymandering Jurisprudence

Snell & Wilmer on

Every ten years, states conduct a redistricting process to redraw state and congressional boundary lines for the selection of elected representatives. Due to its politically thorny nature, this process unsurprisingly results...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP

On May 23, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, No. 22-807. The Court held that the finding of a three-judge district court panel that race was predominant in the...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

United States Supreme Court Sending Chilling Messages for Future of the Voting Rights Act and Redistricting Challenges

Womble Bond Dickinson on

For 57 years, the Voting Rights Act has served as a remarkably effective bulwark against state-level attempts to restrict voting rights, particularly for Black and minority voters. But voting rights are under attack in state...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - November 13, 2018

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the following case: PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc., No 17-1705: Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the Federal...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 25, 2018

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued two decisions today: Ohio v. American Express Co., No 16-1454: American Express (Amex), like all credit-card companies, operates a transaction network that serves two groups:...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Supreme Court Considering Whether to Limit the “Business of Rigging Elections”

Womble Bond Dickinson on

On January 27, 1998, the Winston-Salem Journal featured an article discussing the lack of competitive Congressional races in North Carolina. John Hoeffel, Six Incumbents Are a Week Away From Easy Election, Winston-Salem...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down N.C. Congressional Redistricting

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has taken the extraordinary step of finding that two of North Carolina's congressional districts violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment because they impermissibly utilized race as the...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Cooper v. Harris

On May 22, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Cooper v. Harris, No. 15-1262, holding that a three-judge district court panel did not err in concluding that race furnished the predominant rationale for North Carolina’s...more

Snell & Wilmer

Supreme Court’s Alabama Ruling Sets The Stage For Arizona’s Next Redistricting Battle

Snell & Wilmer on

The U.S. Supreme Court last week reversed a federal three-judge panel in Alabama that upheld the state’s legislative district map against a racial gerrymandering challenge. Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide