News & Analysis as of

Retirement Plan › Fiduciary Duty › Former Employee

Bricker Graydon LLP

Knock Knock, Is Anyone Home? Do You Know Where Your “Missing” Retirement Plan Participants Are?

Bricker Graydon LLP on

In the laundry list of retirement plan administrative and operational requirements, plan sponsors may sometimes overlook their obligations with respect to terminated vested employees. Even though these individuals have left...more

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.

Trader Joe’s sued over their 401(k)

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C. on

Two former employees of Trader Joe’s have sued the company alleging breaches of fiduciary duty in the management of the company’s 401(k) plan....more

Williams Mullen

Federal Judge Dismisses ERISA Fiduciary Breach Claim against University for Lack of Standing

Williams Mullen on

A federal district court judge in Washington D.C. dismissed an ERISA fiduciary breach suit brought by a former employee of George Washington University (“GW”), finding the former employee lacked standing to sue.  The...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Georgetown University Defeats Retirement Plan Fee Litigation and “If a Cat Were a Dog, It Would Bark”

McDermott Will & Emery on

Recently, the US District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a proposed class action lawsuit brought by former Georgetown employees under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) over fees and...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

Chris Lazarini Analyzes ERISA Claims Against Advisor Firm in Putative Class Action

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

Bass, Berry & Sims attorney Chris Lazarini analyzed the putative class active brought against T. Rowe Price Group by current and former employees alleging the firm breached its fiduciary duty by favoring its own financial...more

Proskauer - Employee Benefits & Executive...

Third Circuit Deepens Circuit Split Over Test for “Top Hat” Status Under ERISA

Proskauer - Employee Benefits & Executive... on

A Third Circuit decision, Sikora v. UPMC, 876 F.3d 110 (3d Cir. 2017), deepens a circuit split over whether a participant’s bargaining power is relevant to determining whether a plan qualifies for “top hat” status under...more

6 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide