News & Analysis as of

Riparian Rights

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

National Environmental Policy Act/Nuisance: Federal Appellate Court Addresses Property Owners' Challenge to Oregon Irrigation...

The United States Court of Appeals (“9th Circuit”) addressed in a December 18th memorandum issues arising out of challenges to the Natural Resource Conservation Services (“NRCS”) funding of an irrigation district. See Matthew...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Riparian Rights/Piers and Docks: Federal Court Addresses Ownership of Mississippi River Submerged Waterbed

Co-Author Jesse Long The United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin (“Court”) addressed in an August 22nd Opinion a riparian rights issue. See Clott et al., v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2024 WL...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Riparian Encroachment: New Jersey Appellate Court Addresses Adverse Possession Claim

Co-Author Jesse Long The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division (“Court”) addressed in an October 4th opinion an issue arising out of an adverse possession action. See Cozy Cove Marina, Inc. vs. Nelson Properties...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Riparian Rights/Easement: Illinois Court Addresses Access Issue

An Illinois United States District Court (“Court”) addressed in a September 30th Order issues involving interpretation of riparian rights and easements. The issues arose in the context of Tuggers Burger & Ale House...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Valuation of Riparian Rights: Federal Court Addresses Jurisdictional Issue

A United States Magistrate (U.S. District Court [Alabama]) (“Magistrate”) addressed in an August 2nd Report and Recommendation whether a water law dispute satisfied the jurisdictional minimum of $75,000.00 to remain in...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Endangered Species Act/Citizen Suit Action: Earthjustice Alleges U.S. Department of Interior Violations Approving Pinto Valley...

Earthjustice sent a June 11th 60-day Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) citizen suit Notice of Intent to Sue (“NOI”) to the Tonto National Forest (“Forest”). The NOI alleges that Forest violated Section 7 of the ESA in its...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Stormwater Enforcement: Arkansas Department of Energy and Environment - Division of Environmental Quality and Glenwood...

The Arkansas Department of Energy and Environment – Division of Environmental Quality and Caddo Properties, LLC (“Caddo”) entered into a March 1st Consent Administrative Order (“CAO”) addressing alleged violations of the...more

Williams Mullen

Harvesting Timberland in Virginia? Consider Claiming the Riparian Buffer Tax Credit

Williams Mullen on

Since 2000, the Virginia legislature has granted individual landowners and partnerships up to $17,500 in tax credits for leaving waterway-adjacent stands of trees intact when harvesting timberland. To claim this credit,...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Riparian Rights/Water Treatment Project: New York Appellate Court Addresses Golf Course's Diminished Flow Claim

The New York Supreme Court (Appellate Division) (“Appellate Court”) addressed in an August 11th Memorandum and Order (“Memorandum”) an issue involving a judicial action alleging diminished flow of water between two...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Dam Removal/Riparian Rights: Federal Appellate Court Addresses Taking Claim

The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (Seventh Circuit) addressed in a February 13th Opinion an issue arising out of the removal of a dam that significantly reduced the river water level, adversely...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

94th Arkansas General Assembly/Commissioner of State Lands: Legislation Filed Addressing Procedure for Execution of Deeds for...

House Bill 1163 (“HB1163”) has been filed by Representative Bentley and Senator G. Stubblefield which would amend Ark. Code § 22-5-405 regarding acquisition of deeds by riparian owners for lands in lakes or rivers. Ark....more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Common Enemy Rule/Water Law: Federal District Court Addresses Claim by Adjacent Landowner Against City Official

The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (“Court”) addressed in a July 6 Memorandum issues arising out of stormwater moving from a property to an adjacent parcel at a lower elevation. See...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Lake Access: Michigan Appellate Court Addresses Scope of Servient Easement

The Michigan Court of Appeals (“Court”) addressed in a February 1st opinion the scope of a prescriptive easement in a riparian context. See Astemborski v. Manetta, 2022 WL 301296 (Mich. Ct. App. Feb. 1, 2022). The...more

Buchalter

Curtailments Ordered in the Delta Watershed

Buchalter on

On August 20, 2021, the Deputy Director of the Division of Water Rights (Deputy Director) of the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) issued water curtailment orders for the remainder of August and for all...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Riparian Rights/Non-Navigable Water: Illinois Appellate Court Addresses Access Issue

The Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District (“Court”) addressed in a June 28th Opinion certain riparian rights associated with a non-navigable waterbody. See Holm v. Kodat, 2021 IL App. (3d) 200164. The case involved...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Riparian Rights/Construction of Pier: Wisconsin Appellate Court Addresses Scope of an Easement

The Court of Appeals of Wisconsin (“Court) addressed in a June 23rd Opinion the scope of a lake easement. See Trahan v. Hinton, 2021 WL 2577142. The question considered was whether a pier could be placed within the...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Five Financial Incentives for Conservation-Minded Agriculture Operators

With every change in the federal executive administration, speculation rages over what changes to expect in regulation, policy, and guidance. The current transition is no different. And agricultural policy and conservation...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Submerged Lands: Florida Appellate Court Addresses Whether Adjacent Riparian Landowner Rights Are Restricted

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal (“Court”), in an Opinion published on February 26, 2021, addressed an issue involving the right of a riparian to build a structure over adjacent submerged lands under different...more

Baker Donelson

Who Owns The Right To Develop Along The Shoreline?

Baker Donelson on

There are 7,719 miles of tidal shoreline in Maryland along the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, according to the Maryland Geological Survey. The vast majority of that shoreline is privately owned, thereby limiting the...more

Carlton Fields

Real Property, Financial Services, & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending March 13, 2020

Carlton Fields on

Real Property Update - Foreclosure / Standing: Holder failed to prove standing to enforce note either at inception or at time of judgment because it failed to prove it had possession of original note and accompanying...more

Carlton Fields

Real Property, Financial Services, & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending January 31, 2020

Carlton Fields on

Real Property Update - HOA / Contracts: Trial court erred by entering a post-judgment enforcement order requiring the association to assign its riparian rights to plaintiff pursuant to an enforceable settlement agreement,...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Riparian Zone/Navigable Waterway: Wisconsin Appellate Court Addresses Conflict Regarding Pier/Wet Boathouse

The Court of Appeals of Wisconsin (“Court”) addressed in a November 26th opinion a dispute regarding the ownership of a pier and a wet boathouse. See DeSombre v. Bolderbuck, WL 6314826. The wet boathouse is described as...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Village’s Vitiation of Riparian Rights Survives Initial Challenge

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

In Akeson v Inc. Vil. of Asharoken, 2019 NY Slip Op 32756(U), Index No. 57/2018 (Sup Ct, Suffolk County 2019), the Supreme Court dismissed a petition challenging the Incorporated Village of Asharoken’s (“Asharoken”) decisions...more

Gray Reed

No Sovereign Immunity for the Texas Land Commissioner

Gray Reed on

Suing a state and its public officials is difficult because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity. There are exceptions. State of Texas v. Signal Drilling, et al. presents several of them....more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Subdivision Owned Lake: Missouri Supreme Court Addresses Riparian Rights of Adjacent Landowner

The Supreme Court of Missouri addressed in an April 30th opinion a riparian rights issue associated with an artificial body of water. See Incline Village Board of Trustees v. Elder, 2019 WL 1912218. The question considered...more

44 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide