News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Administrative Procedure Act › Administrative Authority

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Venable LLP

A "Tsunami of Lawsuits Against Agencies"? Taking Stock of the Post-Chevron Government Contracting World

Venable LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court's blockbuster decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo overruled a 40-year-old case (Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.) that required courts to defer to agencies'...more

Carlton Fields

Breeze or Gale? Unanswered Questions at the Heart of the Supreme Court’s Recent Administrative Law Decisions

Carlton Fields on

When legal historians look back on the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2024 term, the most eye-popping decisions will almost certainly be the immunity and ballot access claims lodged by former President Trump. Those opinions are,...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Supreme Court Decisions Curtail Regulatory Agencies’ Powers, Making It Easier To Challenge Rules

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 term is another chapter in the Roberts Court’s trend of shifting power away from administrative agencies and into the hands of courts....more

Mandelbaum Barrett PC

How the Supreme Court’s Loper Decision Overturns Chevron Doctrine and Impacts Employment Law

Mandelbaum Barrett PC on

The Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, __ U.S. __ (2024), overturning the 40-year-old Chevron doctrine, drastically reshapes administrative law....more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Loper Bright, Jarkesy, and Implications for the SEC

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

“Chevron is overruled,” Chief Justice Roberts wrote in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, because “[t]he deference that Chevron requires of courts reviewing agency action cannot be squared with the [Administrative...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

The Net-Net: How the Supreme Court’s Administrative Law Rulings Could Transform the Tech Industry ‎

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC on

This summer, the Supreme Court ended its term shortly after issuing game-changing rulings that modify the authority of federal agencies. Given the result of restraining agencies such as the FTC and FCC from interpreting and...more

Conn Maciel Carey LLP

Destabilized But Not Yet Deconstructed: Analysis of This Momentous SCOTUS Term for the Administrative State

Conn Maciel Carey LLP on

The 2023-2024 Term of the United States Supreme Court will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications in a number of areas, but perhaps most significantly—at least for regular readers of the OSHA Defense Report blog—with...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

What the Supreme Court’s Loper Decision Means for the Affordable Housing Industry

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP on

Ending 40 years of judicial deference to administrative agencies’ interpretations of ambiguous statutes governing them, the Supreme Court of the United States finally pulled the plug on this experiment that it, just five...more

Steptoe & Johnson PLLC

Two U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Will Affect the Securities Industry

Steptoe & Johnson PLLC on

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) recently issued two opinions that are likely to have a longer-term effect on the way securities industry matters are handled. Juries, not the Securities Exchange Commission...more

Holland & Knight LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Rulings Affect Challenges to Tax Regulations

Holland & Knight LLP on

Upon closing its October 2023 term, the U.S. Supreme Court issued two significant opinions – despite neither being a tax case – that will have broad consequences for taxpayers seeking to challenge tax regulations and other...more

Partridge Snow & Hahn LLP

Two Supreme Court Decisions Shift the Ground for Legal Challenges to Federal Agency Actions

Partridge Snow & Hahn LLP on

The Supreme Court has now concluded its most recent term, and in its final two days handed down two decisions with major implications in the area of administrative law (each by a 6-3 margin).  And while their precise...more

Jenner & Block

Client Alert: How Recent Supreme Court Decisions May Impact EHS Agencies and Regulations

Jenner & Block on

The Supreme Court’s recent term is likely to be remembered as one that significantly affected the long-standing roles and responsibilities of federal agencies, including the deference afforded to their interpretations of...more

K&L Gates LLP

Corner Post Magnifies Regulatory Uncertainty After Loper Bright

K&L Gates LLP on

In its last opinion of this term, the US Supreme Court in Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System significantly extended the timeframe in which courts can review certain current and future regulations....more

Stotler Hayes Group, LLC

The (Potential) Bright Side of Loper Bright for the Long-Term Care Industry

Stotler Hayes Group, LLC on

On June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court made a sharp about-face from a doctrine that has governed administrative law for decades, overruling the “Chevron deference” doctrine with its decisions in Loper Bright Enterprises v....more

Latham & Watkins LLP

US Supreme Court Curtails Agency Power: Implications for Fintech and Crypto

Latham & Watkins LLP on

Recent Supreme Court administrative law rulings change the power dynamic between the executive and the judiciary in critical areas of statutory interpretation, enforcement, and immunity from legal challenge....more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Environmental, Social,...

[Commentary] A Trilogy of U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Empower Regulated Entities to Challenge Agency Regulations and Actions

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Environmental, Social,... on

In a trilogy of cases decided at the end of this term, the United States Supreme Court made significant changes to the administrative law terrain by: eliminating Chevron deference....more

Troutman Pepper

SCOTUS Rulings Upend the Administrative Law Landscape

Troutman Pepper on

On June 28, in a highly anticipated ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Chevron USA Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc., finding that Chevron deference, the 40-year-old precedent deferring to reasonable...more

Jones Day

Supreme Court Overrules Chevron Deference

Jones Day on

Federal courts will no longer give controlling weight to agency interpretations of ambiguous laws....more

Quarles & Brady LLP

The Demise of Chevron: End of an Era or More of the Same?

Quarles & Brady LLP on

In a pair of 6-3 decisions issued Friday and Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court dealt back-to-back blows to the administrative state. First, it ruled on Friday in Loper Bright that federal courts can no longer defer to federal...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

CFPB files opposition to preliminary injunction motion in lawsuit challenging Section 1071 final rule

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The CFPB has filed its opposition to the motion seeking a preliminary injunction filed by the plaintiffs in the lawsuit challenging the validity of the CFPB’s final rule implementing Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act (Rule)....more

Hogan Lovells

United States Supreme Court recognizes employer religious freedoms in two recent decisions

Hogan Lovells on

On July 8, 2020, the United States Supreme Court decided two cases addressing employers’ religious freedoms in very different contexts: one concerning whether religious school teachers could challenge adverse employment...more

McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC

Supreme Court Rules that Employers May Use Religious and Moral Exemptions for Requirement to Provide Health Plan Coverage for...

McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC on

On July 8, 2020, in the consolidated cases of Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania et al. and Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. Pennsylvania et al., the U.S. Supreme...more

Foley Hoag LLP

Supreme Court Allows Religious Employer Exemptions from Contraceptive Coverage

Foley Hoag LLP on

On Wednesday, July 8, 2020, the Supreme Court weighed in on whether religious employers are required to offer their employees health plans that include contraceptive coverage. In its opinion in Little Sisters of the Poor v....more

Fisher Phillips

Supreme Court Upholds Rules Expanding Exemptions To ACA’s Contraceptive Mandate

Fisher Phillips on

The Supreme Court just upheld two Trump-era rules expanding religious and moral exemptions to the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) contraceptive mandate. The July 8 decision in Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania is just...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Supreme Court Upholds Exemption to ACA’s Contraceptive Mandate

Ballard Spahr LLP on

In Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court this week upheld regulations issued by the U.S. Departments of Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services (the Departments) that...more

29 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide