News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Administrative Procedure Act › Oral Argument

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Holland & Hart LLP

Chevron Deference Destined for Change in Loper Bright & Relentless

Holland & Hart LLP on

Practical Guidance: Litigation, Professional Perspective - Chevron Deference Destined for Change in Loper Bright & Relentless - Editor's Note: This Professional Perspective addresses how the US Supreme Court's impending...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Trade groups file lawsuit in Texas federal court challenging CFPB final credit card late fee rule and ask for preliminary...

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Just two days after the CFPB issued its final credit card late fee rule (Rule) last week, a lawsuit was filed in a Texas federal district court seeking to invalidate the Rule. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit are the Chamber of...more

Lathrop GPM

Oral Arguments Signal Sea of Change in Future of Administrative Law

Lathrop GPM on

On Jan. 17, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments for two cases widely seen as vehicles for the current court to overturn the judicial doctrine of Chevron deference: Relentless v. Department of Commerce and Loper Bright...more

Beveridge & Diamond PC

2024 Litigation Look Ahead Series: 40 Years of Chevron Deference, Administrative Law Precedent Hangs in the Balance

Beveridge & Diamond PC on

B&D is pleased to present our 2024 Litigation Look Ahead series. In this compilation, our litigation team highlights recently decided or pending cases, many before the U.S. Supreme Court, that could carry significant outcomes...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS holds oral argument in two cases challenging Chevron deference

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On January 17, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the two cases in which the question presented is whether the Court should overrule its 1984 decision in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc. ...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS to hear oral argument on February 20 to determine timing for facial challenges to federal regulations

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled oral argument for Tuesday, February 20, 2024 in Corner Post, Inc. v Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The question that the Supreme Court will decide is when a right of...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS to hear oral argument on January 17 in cases challenging Chevron deference

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled oral argument for January 17, 2024 in the two cases in which the question presented is whether the Court should overrule its 1984 decision in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def....more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Supreme Court to Reconsider the Chevron Doctrine: Does the Bell Toll for Judicial Deference to Administrative Agencies?

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Early next year, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a pair of cases, which could overrule the Chevron doctrine and thereby end nearly forty years of judicial deference to federal administrative agencies’...more

Venable LLP

C[FPB] You Later? Agency’s Future Hangs in the Balance After Oral Argument

Venable LLP on

On October 3, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America, Limited, where the Court is reviewing the Fifth Circuit’s opinion that struck...more

Hudson Cook, LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument on Whether CFPB's Funding Mechanism Is Constitutional

Hudson Cook, LLP on

On October 3, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America. At issue is the constitutionality of the CFPB's funding structure,...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument On Agency-Deference Doctrine

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Should courts defer to agency interpretations of their own regulations so long as the interpretations are reasonable, even if a court believes another reasonable reading of a regulation is the better reading? In Auer v....more

Allen Matkins

The California Implications Of Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association

Allen Matkins on

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass’n et al. The case, if decided against the Department of Labor (Thomas E. Perez is the Secretary of Labor), will have a significant...more

Holland & Knight LLP

U.S. Supreme Court May Require Notice-and-Comment On More Agency Actions

Holland & Knight LLP on

On December 1, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association and Nickols v. Mortgage Bankers Association to address whether a federal agency must engage in notice-and-comment rulemaking...more

13 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide