News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Certiorari › Medicare

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

SCOTUS to Review Case Impacting Medicare Reimbursement for Hospitals Treating Low-Income Patients

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

On June 10, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Becerra for the October 2024 – 2025 term to review a D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling potentially affecting up to $4 billion...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 10, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in two cases: Facebook v. Amalgamated Bank, No. 23-980: This securities law case arises from a shareholder lawsuit against Facebook, which claimed Facebook...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Government...

Supreme Court To Consider The False Claims Act’s Intent Standard

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Government... on

On Friday, January 13, the Supreme Court agreed to consider whether the False Claims Act (“FCA”) covers compliance lapses tied to regulatory interpretations that are incorrect but “objectively reasonable.” The Supreme Court...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

U.S. Supreme Court to Resolve a Circuit Split Involving Qui Tam Actions

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

The Court will decide whether the government can dismiss qui tam actions after initially declining to intervene and what standard courts should apply to the government’s dismissal request. The Supreme Court agreed to...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Supreme Court to Consider DOJ’s Dismissal Authority in False Claims Act Qui Tam Cases

Wiley Rein LLP on

What: The U.S. Supreme Court recently granted certiorari on a petition seeking to curtail the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) ability to dismiss False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam cases, even if DOJ has determined that the...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Supreme Court To Decide Standard For Government Dismissal Of False Claims Act Cases

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The Supreme Court granted certiorari in a case that will decide two important questions under the False Claims Act (FCA).  In United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., the Relator asks the Court to...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 3, 2019

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued four decisions this morning: Azar v. Allina Health Services, No. 17-1484: Congress has passed a law specific to Medicare, requiring that the government provide the public with...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

Update on Azar v. Allina Health Services: Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument on When CMS Must Use Formal Rulemaking

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints on

On January 15, 2019, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Azar v. Allina Health Services, a prominent case involving a challenge by hospitals over when Medicare’s instructions to its contractors impact a “substantive...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

Supreme Court to Decide Critical Case on When CMS Must Use Formal Rulemaking when Instructing Medicare Contractors

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints on

On January 15, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in a hotly-contested case involving a challenge by hospitals over when Medicare’s instructions to its contractors impact a “substantive legal standard” and thus...more

Baker Donelson

Supreme Court Grants Review in Allina Health Services Case

Baker Donelson on

Is the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS or the government) required to engage in notice and comment rulemaking when it changes a requirement that has an important impact on hospitals' reimbursement? As we reported...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - September 27, 2018

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in five cases: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Jackson, No. 17-1471: (1) Whether an original defendant to a class-action claim can remove the class action if it...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Supreme Court Declines to Opine on Circuit Split Over Rule 9(b) Pleading Requirements for FCA Claims

Epstein Becker & Green on

On March 31, 2014, in U.S. ex rel. Nathan v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, the Supreme Court of the United States declined to review a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upholding a district...more

12 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide