News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Enforcement Actions

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Citizen Suit Actions/Clean Water Act: Arkansas and 24 Other State Attorney Generals File Amicus Brief in Support of Writ of...

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,... on

The Arkansas and 24 other State Attorney Generals (collectively, “Amici Curiae”) filed on October 28th an Amicus Brief supporting a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court to address a Clean Water...more

Perkins Coie

Novel Decision Striking Down False Claims Act’s Qui Tam Statute Tees Up Further Litigation Over Whistleblower Lawsuits

Perkins Coie on

A recent Florida district court decision declared that the False Claims Act’s (FCA) qui tam provision violates the Constitution by vesting executive power in private whistleblowers (relators) that have not been appointed by...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Citing Jarkesy, Asbury Automotive Group files suit challenging FTC administrative proceeding

Ballard Spahr LLP on

One of the country’s largest automotive retailers filed suit against the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) on October 4, arguing that the Supreme Court’s recent landmark decision in Securities and Exchange Commission v....more

Ruder Ware

Breaking News: Noncompete Ban Not Dead Yet!

Ruder Ware on

As you know, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) previously issued a rule that would ban most employee noncompetes throughout the United States.  See our previous updates NLRB Seeks Aggressive Enforcement Against Employers for...more

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

Nutter Securities Enforcement Update: Oct. 1 Quarterly Review

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP on

The Nutter Securities Enforcement Update is a periodic update of noteworthy recent securities enforcement activity, settlements, decisions, and charges. We provide brief summaries that highlight recent enforcement action...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

FAQs About the Set-Aside of the FTC’s Ban on Noncompetes

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

In Ryan LLC v. Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC’s) final noncompete rule was held to be “unlawful and set aside” by Judge Ada Brown of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas....more

Cranfill Sumner LLP

After Jarkesy, What Is Next for In-House Enforcement Proceedings?

Cranfill Sumner LLP on

Much virtual ink has been spilled in the weeks and months since the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy—much attesting to that the decision was the death knell for in-house...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Supreme Court Curtails Use of Administrative Courts in SEC Enforcement Proceedings: What it Means for Other Agencies and What...

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that defendants in securities fraud cases brought by the SEC are entitled by the Seventh Amendment to have the SEC’s claims for civil money penalties decided by a jury and not in an...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Keeping the Flame Alive: How IP Protects the Legacy of the Olympics

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Historically, the Olympic Games rank high as one of the most effective international marketing platforms in the world, reaching billions of people in more than 200 countries and territories across the globe. The International...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Unlawful funding argument raised in challenge to final CFPB rule

Ballard Spahr LLP on

We have previously blogged about how targets of CFPB enforcement actions have asserted that the actions must be dismissed because the investigations were conducted and the lawsuits were brought and are being prosecuted with...more

Kohrman Jackson & Krantz LLP

Supreme Court Rules SEC Use of In-House Tribunals Unconstitutional: A Detailed Examination of the Ruling

Kohrman Jackson & Krantz LLP on

On June 27, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in SEC v. Jarkesy, ruling that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) use of in-house tribunals for civil penalties in securities fraud...more

Jenner & Block

Client Alert: Latest Supreme Court Term Presents New Challenges for SEC

Jenner & Block on

The Supreme Court’s most recent term has forced the SEC to face new realities regarding its powers. As has been widely publicized, the Supreme Court’s overruling of Chevron in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo highlighted...more

SEC Compliance Consultants, Inc. (SEC³)

Regulatory Roundup for July 2024

SEC Compliance Consultants, Inc. (SEC³) on

SEC Loses in ALJ Case, DOL’s Latest Fiduciary Rule Put on Hold, and SEC Reconsiders AI and Custody Rule Proposals - Welcome to our July Regulatory Roundup, where we provide a quick look at the latest regulatory developments....more

Stoel Rives - Environmental Law Blog

SEC v. Jarkesy: In-House Adjudicators are Out and the Jury is In

Stoel Rives - Environmental Law Blog on

Why do environmental professionals need to know about a recent securities case? Read on for details. In response to the Wall Street Crash of 1929, Congress passed the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of...more

King & Spalding

Lawmakers Armed with Loper are Preparing to Take Aim at HHS Policies

King & Spalding on

On July 10, 2024, HHS found itself a recipient of one of the dozens of letters sent to various federal agencies by Republican lawmakers. These letters task the federal agencies to themselves identify areas where the agencies...more

ArentFox Schiff

SEC v. Jarkesy’s Implications for Environmental Enforcement Actions

ArentFox Schiff on

On June 27, the US Supreme Court issued an opinion in SEC v. Jarkesy that limits the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) ability to administratively seek civil penalties against defendants for securities fraud....more

Steptoe & Johnson PLLC

Two U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Will Affect the Securities Industry

Steptoe & Johnson PLLC on

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) recently issued two opinions that are likely to have a longer-term effect on the way securities industry matters are handled. Juries, not the Securities Exchange Commission...more

Lowenstein Sandler LLP

Supreme Court: SEC Cannot Force Defendants in Civil-Penalty, Antifraud Enforcement Actions To Litigate Before the Commission...

Lowenstein Sandler LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court recently decided SEC v. Jarkesy. That decision held that individuals subject to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) enforcement actions in which the SEC seeks civil penalties for...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Supreme Court Limits SEC’s In-House Adjudicative Powers

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP on

On June 27, 2024, in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy, the Supreme Court held that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC or the Commission) administrative process for adjudicating fraud-based enforcement...more

Foley Hoag LLP - White Collar Law &...

Supreme Court Significantly Limits the SEC’s Enforcement Power by Prohibiting Administrative Proceedings for Securities Fraud

Foley Hoag LLP - White Collar Law &... on

On June 27, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy. In a 6-3 decision, the Court ruled that securities fraud claims seeking civil penalties must be decided by a jury...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Jarkesy Limits Power of the SEC to Rely on In-House Adjudicators When Pursuing Penalties for Fraud

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court limited the power of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to enforce civil penalties via in-house tribunals in its decision in SEC v. Jarkesy, released on June 27, 2024. In its decision,...more

Goodwin

U.S. Supreme Court Significantly Curtails SEC Enforcement Forum Discretion

Goodwin on

On June 27, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued a much-anticipated decision in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy, holding that parties subject to an enforcement action brought by the U.S. Securities and...more

Hudson Cook, LLP

CFPB Bites of the Month Webinar Recap: The CFPB and the Dust of June

Hudson Cook, LLP on

In this month's article, we share some of our top "bites" covered during the June 2024 webinar....more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Supreme Court Decision in SEC v. Jarkesy Limits the SEC’s Ability to Seek Civil Penalties

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on

On June 26, 2024, the Supreme Court issued a decision in SEC v. Jarkesy, holding that “[w]hen the SEC seeks civil penalties against a defendant for securities fraud, the Seventh Amendment entitles the defendant to a jury...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Supreme Court Holds That Federal Agencies May Seek Punitive Money Penalties Only Before A Jury

Wiley Rein LLP on

Last week the U.S. Supreme Court held in SEC v. Jarkesy that a defendant in a securities fraud suit has the right to be tried by a jury in an Article III court, rather than before an agency’s own tribunal. The Court’s...more

454 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 19
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide