News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Escrow Accounts

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

What Happens When You Ignore the Supreme Court? Maybe the Ninth Circuit Will Find Out – an Update on National Bank Preemption

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

As we reported in June, the Supreme Court handed down a decision in Cantero v. Bank of America on bank pre-emption matters that remanded cases decided by three different Circuit Courts, finding that  the courts did not apply...more

WilmerHale

The Bank Preemption Ripple Effects After Cantero, Flagstar

WilmerHale on

On May 30, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Cantero v. Bank of America, vacating and remanding a decision by the Second Circuit that concluded that the federally authorized powers of national banks under...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Petition for rehearing to be filed in Ninth Circuit in National Bank Act preemption case related to mortgage escrow accounts

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On August 27, we blogged about the Ninth Circuit unpublished panel opinion in Kivett v. Flagstar Bank issued upon remand of the case from the Supreme Court with instructions to follow the guidance of the Supreme Court...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

In finding no National Bank Act Preemption, Ninth Circuit Ignores Supreme Court Directive in and Pays Lip Service to Cantero v....

Ballard Spahr LLP on

In a surprising quick turn of events, on remand from SCOTUS, the 9th Circuit, on August 23, 2024, issued its unanimous unpublished panel opinion in Kivett v. Flagstar Bank, FSB (Kivett II) in which it essentially re-affirmed...more

McGlinchey Stafford

New York’s Interest-On-Escrow Law May Not Be Preempted by the National Bank Act

McGlinchey Stafford on

On May 30, 2024, the Supreme Court reversed the Second Circuit’s holding that New York General Obligation Law § 5–601, which mandates banks to pay borrowers the interest accumulated on a balance held in an escrow account for...more

Troutman Pepper

National Bank Preemption of State Law Following Cantero

Troutman Pepper on

On May 30, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously decided Cantero, reaffirming and elaborating on the Barnett Bank preemption standard, and remanding the case to the Second Circuit for further proceedings. Cantero addressed...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Supreme Court punts another NBA preemption case; this time to the Ninth Circuit

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On June 10, 2024, the Supreme Court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari and issued a summary disposition in Flagstar Bank, N.A. v. Kivett. The Supreme Court vacated the judgment and remanded the case to the Ninth...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Will Supreme Court Ground Tremors Cause National Bank Preemption Tsunami?

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

On May 30th, an unanimous Supreme Court ruled that the Second Circuit needed to take another shot at evaluating whether Bank of America, a national bank, can pre-empt a New York state law requiring the payment of interest on...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Directs Second Circuit to Perform a Barnett Bank Analysis

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

On May 30, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court held in a unanimous decision that the preemption standard codified in section 1044 (12 U.S.C. § 25b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (DFA) requires...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Supreme Court punts the NBA preemption analysis back to the Second Circuit

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On May 30, 2024, in a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court reversed Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A., and remanded it back to the Second Circuit and instructed the appellate court to analyze whether New York’s law requiring...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

U.S. Supreme Court vacates decision on interest for escrow accounts, orders further review

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on

On May 30, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated and remanded for further proceedings a 2022 decision by the Second Circuit that held that the National Bank Act preempted a New York state law requiring the payment of interest on...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects a More Bright-Line National Bank Act Preemption Standard

Husch Blackwell LLP on

In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a more bright-line standard for determining whether the National Bank Act (NBA) preempts a state law. Rather, the Supreme Court explained that the NBA preemption...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A.

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On May 30, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A., No. 22-529, holding that courts must conduct a practical assessment of the nature and degree of the interference when determining whether a...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS oral argument in Cantero v. Bank of America provides no clear indication of likely outcome

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On February 27, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A., a case involving the effect of the Dodd-Frank Act on the scope of preemption under the National Bank Act (NBA). The...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Former Comptrollers of the Currency file amicus brief in SCOTUS case disagreeing with Justice Dept. on scope of national bank...

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The scope of national bank preemption is currently before the U.S. Supreme Court in Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A. A New York statute requires the payment of interest on mortgage escrow accounts and the question before the...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Bank of America files merits brief with SCOTUS in National Bank Act preemption case; DOJ seeks leave to participate in oral...

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Bank of America, N.A. has filed its merits brief in Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A., the case currently before the U.S. Supreme Court dealing with the scope of national bank preemption.  The petitioners must file their reply...more

Troutman Pepper

Amici Argue for Narrow Interpretation of National Bank Act Preemption

Troutman Pepper on

A group of non-profit consumer advocacy organizations, the Conference of State Bank Supervisors, and the American Association of Residential Mortgage Regulators filed two separate briefs asking the U.S. Supreme Court to...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Supreme Court Grants Cert for Interest-on-Escrow Preemption Case

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court recently granted certiorari to hear the Second Circuit case of Cantero et al. v. Bank of America, N.A., involving National Bank Act (NBA) preemption of New York’s law requiring that interest be paid to...more

Saiber LLC

SCOTUS Agrees to Hear Case Concerning State Regulation of Federal Banks

Saiber LLC on

The Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to hear Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A., a case that concerns the power of states to regulate federally-chartered banks. The Court has granted review of the case despite the...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - October 16, 2023

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

On October 13, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in 4 cases: Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce, 22-1219: This is the second case that the Court has agreed to hear this term...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS asks for Solicitor General’s views on federal preemption of state laws requiring payment of interest on mortgage escrow...

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has invited the Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in two cases involving the question whether state laws requiring the payment of interest on mortgage escrow...more

Saiber LLC

United States Supreme Court Asked to Resolve Circuit Split Over Whether Federally Chartered Banks Must Comply With State Laws...

Saiber LLC on

In Cantero vs. Bank of America, N.A., mortgage borrowers are asking the Supreme Court of the United States to reverse a Second Circuit ruling that federally-chartered banks need not comply with state laws that require the...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Mooting Class Actions by Offer of Judgment – Episode 2: The Ninth Circuit Strikes Back

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

In Campbell-Ewald v. Gomez, 136 S. Ct. 663 (Jan. 20, 2016), the Supreme Court resolved a split among courts and held that an unaccepted settlement offer of complete individual relief does not moot the plaintiff’s lawsuit. ...more

Locke Lord LLP

Ninth Circuit Rejects Mootness Where Defendant Escrows Offered Funds, Broadening Campbell-Ewald

Locke Lord LLP on

The Ninth Circuit has answered questions left open by the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent Campbell-Ewald v. Gomez decision by finding a putative class action was not moot even where the defendant deposited the offered funds into...more

24 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide