News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Medicare Advantage

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

Insights From the 2025 American Health Law Association’s Long Term and Post-Acute Care Law and Compliance Conference

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP on

This year, health lawyers, providers, consultants, and government experts from across the country convened in Orlando, Florida, for the American Health Law Association’s Long Term and Post-Acute Care Law and Compliance...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

2025 Perspectives in Private Equity: Health Care & Life Sciences

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

Private equity investors in health care and life sciences must navigate a complex and shifting landscape influenced by regulatory and policy changes and technological advancements. As private equity investments in the health...more

Epstein Becker & Green

The 340B Reimbursement Battle: What Hospitals and Insurers Need to Know

Epstein Becker & Green on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in American Hospital Association (“AHA”) v. Becerra (2022) sent shockwaves through the 340B drug pricing program when it held that CMS’ reduction of reimbursement for drugs purchased under the...more

ArentFox Schiff

Investigations Newsletter: Massachusetts District Court Judge Applies Heightened Causation Standard in FCA Case

ArentFox Schiff on

Massachusetts District Court Judge Applies Heightened Causation Standard in FCA Case - On January 6, a District Court of Massachusetts judge granted summary judgment for defendants on allegations of violating the...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

EnforceMintz — Medicare Advantage and Part D Programs to Remain in the Enforcement Spotlight in 2025

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints on

As government scrutiny and enforcement targeting the Medicare Advantage (Medicare Part C) program continued in 2024, the industry’s response to agency actions escalated. Last year also resulted in the first sizable Part D...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

EnforceMintz — Scienter, Causation, and Constitutional Questions: 2024’s Three Key FCA Litigation Issues

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints on

In 2024, federal courts issued a number of important decisions in False Claims Act (FCA) cases that are particularly noteworthy for the health care and life sciences industries. We focus here on decisions that further develop...more

King & Spalding

Medicare Advantage Payors Have Not Redressed 340B Underpayments

King & Spalding on

CMS recently published its remedy in response to the Supreme Court’s decision that CMS’s 340B outpatient drug payment policy violated the Medicare statute. Many hospitals that are 340B covered entities will now receive tens...more

King & Spalding

Supreme Court Ruling in AHA v. Becerra May Affect 340B Hospitals' Reimbursement Rights Against Medicare Advantage Plans

King & Spalding on

Hospitals that participate in the 340B program may be entitled to additional monies from Medicare Advantage plans in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in AHA v. Becerra. In AHA v. Becerra, a unanimous Supreme Court...more

K&L Gates LLP

Recent Developments to the 340B Drug Pricing Program

K&L Gates LLP on

In this episode Victoria Hamscho, Andrew Ruskin, and Leah Richardson provide an update on key developments to the 340B Program. They discuss the effects of the Supreme Court’s decision earlier this year overturning 340B...more

Burr & Forman

Hot Topics in Health Care - November 2022

Burr & Forman on

Physician Groups Voice Strong Opposition to Proposed Expanded Scope of Practice for Non-Physician Practitioners - The American Medical Association and over 80 other physician industry groups have come out in strong...more

ArentFox Schiff

Investigations Newsletter: SCOTUS Denies Cert In Cases Addressing FCA Pleadings Requirements

ArentFox Schiff on

SCOTUS Denies Cert In Cases Addressing FCA Pleadings Requirements - On Monday, October 17, 2022, the US Supreme Court rejected three petitions asking the Court to resolve a circuit split regarding the Rule 9(b)...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Managed Care & the FCA: Are Courts Getting It Right?

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Courts are grappling with unique questions in the context of managed care programs in False Claims Act (FCA) cases. But are they getting it right? Two questions trending in courts relate to: (1) materiality under the FCA when...more

King & Spalding

U.S. Supreme Court Will Not Review D.C. Circuit Court’s Revival of False Claims Act Liability for Medicare Advantage Plans Failing...

King & Spalding on

On June 21, 2022, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in the case of UnitedHealthcare Co., et al v. Becerra et al., Case No. 21-1140, wherein UnitedHealthcare attempted to overturn the D.C. Circuit Court’s revival of CMS’s...more

Proskauer - Health Care Law Brief

The Supreme Court Denies Petition Challenging CMS’s Overpayment Rule

Proskauer - Health Care Law Brief on

This past week, the Supreme Court of the United States (Supreme Court) denied UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company’s (UnitedHealthcare) petition for a writ of certiorari (Petition) challenging, in part, the Centers for Medicare...more

Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA)

Hooper, Kearney and Macklin on Cutting Edge Topics in the False Claims Act

Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA) on

While the pandemic put many things on hold, it did not do the same for the False Claims Act (FCA). To find out what is happening in FCA activity we spoke with Patrick Hooper, Jordan Kearney and Alicia Macklin, partners at the...more

Foley Hoag LLP - Medicaid and the Law

A Loss in SCOTUS Prompts New CMS Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

Foley Hoag LLP - Medicaid and the Law on

On August 4th, CMS released a proposed rule titled Treatment of Medicare Part C Days in the Calculation of a Hospital’s Medicare Disproportionate Patient Percentage (DPP). We’ve written before about the Medicaid...more

K&L Gates LLP

K&L Gates Triage: The Impact of Allina — Potential Limitation on CMS’s Ability to Recoup Overpayments

K&L Gates LLP on

In this week’s episode, Adam Cooper discusses the Supreme Court’s decision in Azar v. Allina Health Services, as well as a related memorandum issued in late 2019 by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) that...more

Morgan Lewis - Health Law Scan

HHS Analyzes Legal Impact of Allina on Agency Enforcement

Morgan Lewis - Health Law Scan on

The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of General Counsel (OGC) offered the healthcare industry the benefit of its legal analysis of the recent US Supreme Court opinion in Azar v. Allina Health Services...more

Polsinelli

CMS Outlines New Standard for Challenging Medicare Payment Denials, Echoing Brand Memo on Force of Sub-Regulatory Guidance

Polsinelli on

On October 31, 2019, the Office of General Counsel for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued an important memo from Kelly M. Cleary, CMS Chief Legal Officer, and Brenna E. Jenny, Deputy General...more

Polsinelli

Azar v. Allina Health Services: Hospitals Claim (Procedural) Victory in DSH Dispute

Polsinelli on

On June 3, 2019, the Supreme Court issued an eagerly anticipated opinion in Azar v. Allina Health Services, a decision with far-reaching implications both for the calculation of disproportionate share payments and provider...more

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck

Medicare Rulemaking After Azar v. Allina Health Services

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck on

The Medicare Program, established in 1965, initially seemed simple: provide health care for senior citizens by paying hospitals and doctors directly for the care the seniors required. Initially, there were two parts to...more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Supreme Court Overturns Disproportionate Share Hospital Payment Policy and Limits CMS Use of Subregulatory Guidance

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP on

On June 3, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Azar v. Allina Health Services, et al., Case No. 17-1484. The Court ruled in favor of a group of hospitals in a dispute over Medicare disproportionate share...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Hospitals in HHS DSH Payment Dispute

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP on

On June 3, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) issued an opinion in Azar v. Allina Health Services whereby it ruled that the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) violated the Medicare...more

McGuireWoods Consulting

Supreme Court Rules HHS Cannot Take Short-Cuts in Rulemaking

McGuireWoods Consulting on

In a 7-to-1 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court on June 3, 2019, held that “Because the Department of Health and Human Services neglected its statutory notice-and-comment obligations when it revealed a new policy that...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

What You Want to Know about the Supreme Court’s Recent Allina Decision

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In a landmark decision on June 3, 2019, the Supreme Court held that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) was required to engage in notice and comment rulemaking before publishing methodology (Medicare Fractions)...more

36 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide