News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Removal Orders

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - March 20, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

On March 19, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States issued two decisions: FBI v. Fikre, 22-1178: This case addresses when the “voluntary cessation of a challenged practice” renders a lawsuit moot. Yonas Fikre, a...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Two Plaintiffs Win Border Battles as Court Emphasizes When It Has Jurisdiction in Cases with Substantial Factual Issues - SCOTUS...

Epstein Becker & Green on

Yonas Fikre, a U.S. citizen who had emigrated from Sudan, found himself placed on the No Fly List by the FBI and unable to return to the United States from an international trip. This action followed Fikre’s having been...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Johnson v. Guzman Chavez

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On June 29, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Johnson v. Guzman Chavez, holding that the detention of a noncitizen ordered removed from the United States who reenters without authorization is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1231....more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides United States v. Palomar-Santiago

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On May 24, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court decided United States v. Palomar-Santiago, No. 20-437, holding that each of the statutory requirements for bringing a collateral attack against a removal order under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d)...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Noncitizen Bears Burden Of Proof When Challenging Deportation, U.S. Supreme Court Rules

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

A noncitizen applying for relief from deportation bears the burden of proving all elements of eligibility for relief, including that a conviction under a divisible state statute does not render the person ineligible for...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - January 11, 2021

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., No. 20-440: Whether a defendant in a patent infringement action who assigned the patent, or is in privity with an assignor of the patent, may have a defense of invalidity heard on the...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 25, 2020

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, No. 19-161. Under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (“IIRIRA”), Congress in 1996 crafted a system for processing aliens apprehended at or near...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, No. 19-161

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On June 25, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, holding that the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act’s limitations neither violated due process nor...more

8 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide