News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Reorganizations › Chapter 11

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Rivkin Radler LLP

Justices’ Ch. 11 Ruling Is A Big Moment For Debtors’ Insurers

Rivkin Radler LLP on

In one of the most publicized terms for the U.S. Supreme Court, one June decision has not received the attention it deserves: Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Company Inc. Truck upends decades of Chapter 11...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Insights for Insurers

How the U.S. Supreme Court's Rulings on Kaiser and Purdue Pharma Affect Insurers' Rights and Interests in Chapter 11 Cases

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Insights for Insurers on

On June 6, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision on an insurer’s standing in its policyholders’ Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding in Truck Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., 144 S. Ct. 1414 (2024). The decision...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

The Impact of Purdue Pharma

Fox Rothschild LLP on

It has been approximately two months since the highly anticipated Supreme Court decision in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., and it is already making a significant impact in bankruptcies around the country. In September...more

Snell & Wilmer

SCOTUS Decides Against Sacklers’ Release in Purdue Pharma

Snell & Wilmer on

On June 27, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P. The issue before the Court was whether the Bankruptcy Code permits nondebtors to obtain a release of...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Supreme Court Rejects Purdue Pharma’s Bankruptcy Plan

Rivkin Radler LLP on

On June 27, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked a $6 billion bankruptcy settlement in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L. P., No. 23-124, 2024 WL 3187799, at *11 (U.S. June 27, 2024). The Court found that the Bankruptcy Code does...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Supreme Court Finds Insurers Have Standing in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Proceedings

Rivkin Radler LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court on June 6, 2024, held that an insurer with a financial responsibility for bankruptcy claims is a party in interest and has standing to raise and be heard on issues in a Chapter 11 proceeding. In Truck...more

Mayer Brown

I Shall (Not) Be Released: With Purdue Pharma Decision, US Supreme Court Remakes Chapter 11 Landscape

Mayer Brown on

They say every man needs protection, they say that every man must fall. For over 40 years, “the bankruptcy community has recognized the resolution of mass tort claims as a widely accepted core function of bankruptcy courts,”...more

Cozen O'Connor

Supreme Court Orders Stand Down on Insurance Neutrality Test for Standing

Cozen O'Connor on

On June 6, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-awaited ruling in Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., et al.,1 nullifying the insurance neutrality test for insurer standing in bankruptcy...more

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

Purdue Pharma Plan Blocked, Supreme Court Bars Third-Party Releases in Bankruptcy

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP on

A sharply divided U.S. Supreme Court has barred the issuance of non-consensual third-party releases in Chapter 11 Plans. In a 5-4 decision, the court held that “the bankruptcy code does not authorize a release and injunction...more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

SCOTUS in Purdue: Non-Debtor Third-Party Releases Are Not Permitted in Chapter 11 Plans Without Consent

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

On June 27, 2024, the United States Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court” or “Court”) rendered a 5-4 opinion in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. that “the [B]ankruptcy [C]ode does not authorize a release and injunction that, as...more

McGuireWoods LLP

Shifting Gears on Insurer Participation in Chapter 11 Proceedings: U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Longstanding “Insurance Neutrality”...

McGuireWoods LLP on

Last week’s Privilege Point described an opinion requiring a corporate party’s witness to disclose communications with his Latham & Watkins lawyers, because he confirmed with that firm his own “commercial understanding” about...more

Kennedys

Insurer deemed “party in interest” in insureds’ Chapter 11 case

Kennedys on

The US Supreme Court ruled that an insurer with financial responsibility for bankruptcy claims is a “party in interest” under Bankruptcy Code §1109(b) that “may raise and may appear and be heard on any issue” in a Chapter 11...more

Goldberg Segalla

U.S. Supreme Court Holds that Insurers are Parties in Interest in Bankruptcy Proceedings and Can Object to Reorganization Plans

Goldberg Segalla on

Companies faced with numerous mass tort claims, such as asbestos claims, often seek bankruptcy protection. Reorganization plans may include § 524(g) channeling injunctions in which insurance assets are put into a trust to pay...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 6, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued three decisions today: Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, No. 23-250: This case concerns the funding the Indian Health Service (“IHS”) must provide to Indian tribes that...more

White and Williams LLP

Supreme Court Endorses Broad Insurer Standing in Bankruptcy Reorganizations

White and Williams LLP on

The Supreme Court reversed the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of insurance companies in a unanimous decision written by Justice Sotomayor. In short, the United States Supreme Court held today that insurers facing...more

Epstein Becker & Green

A Day for Specialists - SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

Another Three-for Thursday at the Supreme Court, with none of the decisions a landmark but each of utmost relevance to legal specialists and technicians in the fields of bankruptcy, estate taxation, and Indian affairs....more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Insights for Insurers

How Several U.S. Supreme Court Cases This Term Will Significantly Impact Insurers

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Insights for Insurers on

Insurers are impacted in many ways by the United States (U.S.) Supreme Court decisions, but very rarely does the Supreme Court wade into decisions directly involving insurance contracts or the rights of insurers. This term,...more

Hicks Johnson

Sackler Family’s Fate in the Supreme Court Is Poised to Transform Texas Bankruptcy Law

Hicks Johnson on

On December 4, 2023, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a case that may have major implications for bankruptcy law in the Fifth Circuit. While the Fifth Circuit (along with the Ninth and Tenth Circuits) has held...more

Kerr Russell

U.S. Supreme Court to Address Permissibility of Non-Consensual Third-Party Releases in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Plans

Kerr Russell on

As the calendar turns to autumn, the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) is commencing its new term and preparing to address a monumental issue that will impact chapter 11 law and the mass tort system: the permissibility...more

Jones Day

Business Restructuring Review | March–April 2022

Jones Day on

MODIFICATION OF SECURED LOAN UNDER CRAMDOWN CHAPTER 11 PLAN WARRANTED DUE TO PLAN FEASIBILITY THREAT - Many recent court rulings concerning the treatment of secured creditors under a chapter 11 plan have focused on...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

In “Non-Statutory Insider” Case, Supreme Court Clarifies the Standard of Review for Mixed Questions of Law and Fact

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on

In U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Village at Lakeridge, LLC, No. 15-1509, 2018 U.S. LEXIS 1520 (Mar. 5, 2018), the Supreme Court analyzed the appropriate standard of review for appellate courts reviewing a bankruptcy court’s...more

Jones Day

Supreme Court Adopts Deferential Standard of Review on Chapter 11 Insider Status

Jones Day on

In U.S. Capital Bank N.A. v. Village at Lakeridge, LLC, No. 15-1509 (U.S. Mar. 5, 2018), the U.S. Supreme Court held that an appellate court should apply a deferential standard of review to a bankruptcy court's decision as to...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Supreme Court Lakeridge Decision Clarifies the Standard of Review of Mixed Questions of Law and Fact

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP on

In another decision affecting Chapter 11 cases, U.S. Bank National Association v. Village at Lakeridge, --- S. Ct. ---, 2018 WL 1143822 (2018), on March 5, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision,...more

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

Who Is A Non-Statutory Insider? The U.S. Supreme Court Provides (Some) Guidance on the Appropriate Standard of Review for this...

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP on

On March 5, 2018 the United State Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in U.S. Bank NA v. The Village at Lakeridge, LLC, 583 U.S. ___ (2018), answering the narrow question of what is the proper standard of review for...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Village at Lakeridge, LLC

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On March 5, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States decided U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Village at Lakeridge, LLC, No 15-1509, holding that a bankruptcy court’s determination of whether a set of facts demonstrated an arms-length...more

27 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide