News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Securities Violations › Securities Act of 1933

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Carlton Fields

Supreme Court Clarifies That No Private Cause of Action Exists Under Rule 10b-5 for Pure Omissions, Only Uncorrected Half-Truths

Carlton Fields on

On April 12, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners, L.P., resolving a circuit split among the Second, Third, and Ninth Circuits over whether plaintiffs could pursue...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Supreme Court Narrows Securities Fraud Exposure

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

The Supreme Court recently took away an often-used weapon by shareholder plaintiffs in securities fraud cases, ruling that “pure omissions” from periodic SEC filings (absent any other duty to disclose) are not actionable...more

Stinson - Corporate & Securities Law Blog

Supreme Court: Rule 10b-5 Does Not Cover Pure Omissions

Stinson - Corporate & Securities Law Blog on

In Macquarie Infrastructure Corp., et al., v. Moab Partners, L. P., et. al, a unanimous United States Supreme Court held that failure to make MD&A disclosures required by Item 303 of Regulation S-K does not violate Rule...more

A&O Shearman

United States Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal In Case Concerning Whether Private Securities Litigation Reform Act’s Automatic Stay...

A&O Shearman on

On February 21, 2023, the United States Supreme Court formally dismissed the appeal of a case in which a settlement had been announced after certiorari was granted to review a decision by a California state court allowing...more

Proskauer - Corporate Defense and Disputes

Supreme Court to Decide Whether Discovery Stays Apply to State-Court Securities Lawsuits This Fall

Proskauer - Corporate Defense and Disputes on

One of the most significant differences between bringing a securities lawsuit in state versus federal court is the application of the mandatory discovery stay set forth in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (the...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Delaware Supreme Court: Delaware Corporations May Adopt Federal-Forum Provisions Requiring That Securities Act Claims Be Brought...

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

Ruling suggests a new means of stemming the flood tide of state-court Securities Act claims that followed the U.S. Supreme Court’s Cyan decision in 2018. But uncertainty lingers as to whether post-IPO public companies can...more

Jones Day

SEC Enforcement in Financial Reporting and Disclosure: 2019 Year-End Update

Jones Day on

We are pleased to present our annual year-end update on financial reporting and issuer disclosure enforcement activity for 2019. This White Paper focuses on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's ("SEC") enforcement...more

White & Case LLP

Lorenzo v. SEC: Disseminating false information can create Rule 10b-5 liability even for those who did not "make" the false...

White & Case LLP on

On March 27, 2019, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Lorenzo v. SEC, affirming the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The Court held that "dissemination of false or misleading...more

A&O Shearman

U.S. Chamber Of Commerce's Institute Of Legal Reform Publishes Report On "Broken Securities Class Action System" And Proposes...

A&O Shearman on

On February 25, 2019, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Institute of Legal Reform (the “ILR”) published a report entitled “Containing the Contagion: Proposals to Reform the Broken Securities Class Action System” (the “Report”)....more

Foley & Lardner LLP

SCOTUS Keeps Door Open for Federal-Law, State-Court Securities Class Actions. Where Does This Leave Katz?

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, No. 15-1439 (Mar. 20, 2018), the Supreme Court recently held that certain federal securities-law claims could proceed in state courts—despite the narrowing effect of...more

Butler Snow LLP

Skeptical of Elephants in Mouseholes and Monster Arguments, the Supreme Court Holds Plaintiffs Can Still File 1933 Act Securities...

Butler Snow LLP on

On March 20, 2018, the United States Supreme Court released its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, 138 S.Ct. 1061 (2018). In Cyan, the Court considered whether plaintiffs can file...more

Moore & Van Allen PLLC

The Doors of State Courthouses Remain Open to Class Action Plaintiffs with Federal Securities Act of 1933 Claims Related to...

Moore & Van Allen PLLC on

In 2017, federal securities class actions were filed at a rapid clip, averaging more than one per day – a level not seen in nearly 20 years according to survey data. It was the third year of growth and a 44% increase over...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

IPOs and Registered Offerings Beware – Supreme Court Decision Risks Increased Lawsuits in State Courts

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

On March 20, 2018, a unanimous United States Supreme Court, in Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver Cty. Employees Ret. Fund, No. 15-1439, 2018 WL 1384564, answered two questions concerning investors' ability to pursue alleged violations of...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Supreme Court Rules That Securities Act Class Actions May Proceed in State Court

Fenwick & West LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that class action plaintiffs can bring claims under the Securities Act of 1933 in either state or federal court. ...more

BakerHostetler

Race to the State Courthouse?: How the Ruling in Cyan Changes Where and How Securities Actions Are Fought

BakerHostetler on

On March 20, 2018, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, No. 15-1439, that securities plaintiffs could bring class actions under the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Supreme Court in Cyan Upholds State Court Securities Act Class Actions

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP on

In Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, No. 15-1439, decided on March 20, 2018, the Supreme Court unanimously held that class actions based solely on the Securities Act of 1933 (33 Act) may be brought in...more

Troutman Pepper

Supreme Court's Cyan Decision Means Open Season for Investor Class Actions After IPOs

Troutman Pepper on

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision on March 20 holding that investors are free to file securities class action lawsuits challenging the veracity of stock registration statements under Section 11 of the...more

Jones Day

Supreme Court Rules on State Court Jurisdiction over Securities Act Lawsuits

Jones Day on

In recent years, plaintiffs increasingly have challenged initial public offerings by filing securities class actions in state courts, especially California, due to an unsettled jurisdictional question. In Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver...more

Burr & Forman

SCOTUS: Pure ‘33 Act Class Actions Not Removable Under SLUSA

Burr & Forman on

A unanimous Supreme Court recently held that “covered class actions” over exchange-traded securities are not removable from state courts under SLUSA when they assert only ‘33 Act claims....more

Cooley LLP

Alert: Supreme Court Allows Securities Act Class Actions to Remain in State Court

Cooley LLP on

Last Tuesday, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Cyan Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund. The opinion by Justice Elena Kagan for a unanimous court answered two questions: Did the Securities Litigation...more

A&O Shearman

U.S. Supreme Court Holds In Cyan That SLUSA Does Not Divest State Courts Of Jurisdiction Over Federal Securities Act Claims And...

A&O Shearman on

On March 20, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States, in a unanimous decision delivered by Justice Kagan, ruled that state courts have jurisdiction to adjudicate class actions brought under the Securities Act of 1933...more

Mintz

Issuers Face Changing Litigation Landscape, Challenges Due to Supreme Court Ruling

Mintz on

In a boon for public company shareholder plaintiffs this week, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld state courts’ concurrent jurisdiction over securities class actions alleging violations of certain federal securities laws. The...more

Perkins Coie

U.S. Supreme Court Confirms State Courts Can Resolve Covered 1933 Act Class Actions

Perkins Coie on

On Tuesday, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court held that state courts have jurisdiction to hear “covered” class-action claims under the Securities Act of 1933 (1993 Act), and that defendants may not remove such claims to federal...more

Morgan Lewis

US Supreme Court Upholds State Court Jurisdiction for Class Actions Under Securities Act of 1933

Morgan Lewis on

In a decision that has implications for both corporate and individual defendants, the US Supreme Court ruled that class actions being brought under the Securities Act of 1933 must remain in state court. As a result,...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Life After Cyan: Tips for Handling State Court Jurisdiction of ’33 Act Claims

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

On Tuesday, March 20, 2018, the Supreme Court unanimously held in Cyan Inc. v. Beaver County Employees’ Retirement Fund, that state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over securities class actions brought under the...more

44 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide