News & Analysis as of

Section 337 Patent Infringement Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)

McDermott Will & Emery

Section 337 Doesn’t Require Article III Standing for Claimant but Claimant Must Be “Patentee”

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded a district court’s grant of summary judgment, finding that the language used in an invention assignment clause was subject to more than one reasonable...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

2023 ITC Section 337 Year in Review: Analysis & Trends: Introduction

Section 337 investigations at the ITC have proven to be an efficient and powerful method for Complainants seeking relief from unfair importation. The Commission’s injunctive powers provide an attractive forum for Complainants...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

2023 ITC Section 337 Year in Review: Analysis & Trends

Section 337 investigations at the ITC have proven to be an efficient and powerful method for Complainants seeking relief from unfair importation. The Commission’s injunctive powers provide an attractive forum for Complainants...more

Fish & Richardson

ITC Monthly Wrap-Up: January 2024

Fish & Richardson on

This month’s ITC wrap-up focuses on an initial determination in an investigation regarding constitutional standing, which is a requirement at the Commission as in federal court....more

Fish & Richardson

ITC Monthly Wrap-Up: December 2023

Fish & Richardson on

This month’s ITC Wrap-Up reviews a recent investigation exploring exemptions to the Commission’s remedial orders. Certain Wet Dry Surface Cleaning Devices, Inv. No. 337-TA-1304, Final Determination (Dec. 18, 2023)....more

Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC

Apple Watch Imports (Possibly) Banned By The ITC: What Patent Owners Need To Know

Regular consumers now enjoy a front-row seat to the long-running intellectual property dispute between Apple, the tech giant based in Cupertino, California, and Masimo, a medical device company based in Irvine, California....more

Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.

The ITC in 2023: A Look at Five of the Most Surprising Section 337 Developments

2023 was an exciting year for Section 337 litigation at the ITC, particularly in the final quarter of the year. As we ring in the new year, Wolf Greenfield Shareholder Libbie DiMarco examines five of the most noteworthy ITC...more

Fish & Richardson

ITC Monthly Wrap-Up: December 2022

Fish & Richardson on

In December, six complainants filed three Section 337 complaints with the International Trade Commission (ITC)...more

Knobbe Martens

Apple Watch Found to Infringe AliveCor ECG Patents

Knobbe Martens on

AliveCor, Inc., a company focused on cardiac data and remote medicine, successfully convinced an International Trade Commission (ITC) judge that Apple, Inc. infringed multiple AliveCor patents related to electrocardiogram...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

ALJ Finds Polycrystalline Diamond Compact Claims Patent Ineligible Because They Recite Conventional Structure Combined with...

Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Cameron Elliot recently found no violation of Section 337 in part because the claims recite patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The patents are directed to polycrystalline...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Prior Invention as a Litigation Defense: All Claim Elements Must Be Appreciated

In Ingevity Corporation v. International Trade Commission, the Federal Circuit held that a prior invention will not anticipate under 35 U.S.C. § 102(g) unless the prior inventors appreciated the invention. Specifically, an...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Jennewein Biotechnologie GmbH v. International Trade Commission (Fed. Cir. 2021)

The International Trade Commission can more readily provide injunctive relief against an adjudged infringer than a district court, under appropriate conditions (i.e., with regard to an infringing product or a product made by...more

Haug Partners LLP

The Effect of Proposed Legislative Reform at the ITC

Haug Partners LLP on

Last week, for the second time in two years, members of the House of Representatives proposed legislation limiting the ability of certain entities to file complaints for unfair trade practices at the U.S. International Trade...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. International Trade Comm. (Fed. Cir. 2021)

Last week, the Federal Circuit affirmed imposition of an exclusion order under 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930) by the Federal Trade Commission against 10X Genomyx (an intervenor in this appeal) over...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. Int'l. Trade Comm. (Fed. Cir. 2021)

Last month, the Federal Circuit affirmed an exclusion order imposed by the International Trade Commission against Bio-Rad for importing infringing microfluidic systems and components used for gene sequencing or related...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Federal Circuit Appeals from the PTAB and ITC: Summaries of Key 2020 Decisions: Comcast Corp. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 951 F.3d 1301...

The International Trade Commission found a violation of Section 337 by Comcast X1 set-top boxes, and Comcast appealed two issues of statutory interpretation underlying the Commission’s finding. First, Comcast argued that its...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Federal Circuit Appeals from the PTAB and ITC: Summaries of Key 2020 Decisions

[co-author: Kathleen Wills] Last year, the global COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented challenges for American courts. By making several changes, however, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was able to...more

Goodwin

ITC 337 Quarterly Insider Q2 2020

Goodwin on

Goodwin’s 337 Quarterly Insider remains the premiere publicly available source for keeping up to date on all meaningful decisions coming out of the Commission. Please find below Goodwin’s insights on the months of April, May,...more

Troutman Pepper

Federal Circuit Review - Issue 272

Troutman Pepper on

272-1 Federal Circuit Holds a New Invalidity Challenge at the ITC is not a Change in Condition that Enables the ITC to review the Validity of a Patent or Rescind an Exclusion Order - The Federal Circuit (Court) recently...more

Jones Day

ITC Recommends GEO Against Inexpensive Slider Devices Sold Through E-Commerce Websites

Jones Day on

In a recently issued initial determination, the ITC granted summary determination on violation and recommended issuance of a general exclusion order (“GEO”) against respondents after finding that a limited exclusion order...more

Jones Day

Redesign Cleared Following Adverse Initial Determination

Jones Day on

In an dispute involving garage door openers, Respondent successfully utilized a Modification Proceeding pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1337(k) to obtain a determination from the ITC that its redesigned product did not infringe the...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Patents Claiming a Range of Values, Such as Gate Sizes for Semiconductor Chips, Must Enable One of Ordinary Skill to Make and Use...

A recent initial determination at the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) determined that claims directed to semiconductor chips with no lower bounds for recited gate pitch and width ranges (e.g., “less than or equal to...more

Jones Day

ITC Finds Violation Based on Infringement of Method Claim After Importation

Jones Day on

A recent opinion by the ITC reiterates that a violation of Section 337 can be based on infringement of a method claim that occurs after importation of the relevant article(s). Certain Blood Cholesterol Testing Strips and...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Knowledge and Control of Importation Can Lead to § 337 Violation

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a US International Trade Commission (ITC) decision that a respondent qualified as an importer under § 337 despite not being the actual importer of record, based on the...more

Jones Day

Circumstantial Evidence Can Help You Satisfy The Importation Requirement…But Only Under The Right Circumstances

Jones Day on

In a recent summary determination order, ALJ Bullock found that complainants cannot always rely on circumstantial evidence to satisfy the Section 337 importation requirement. Certain Height-Adjustable Desk Platforms and...more

103 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 5

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide