News & Analysis as of

Securities Exchange Act Arkansas Teacher Retirement System v Goldman Sachs Group Class Action

The Securities Exchance Act is a United States federal statute enacted in 1934 to govern the secondary securities trading market. In addition, the Securities Exchange Act established the Securities and Exchange... more +
The Securities Exchance Act is a United States federal statute enacted in 1934 to govern the secondary securities trading market. In addition, the Securities Exchange Act established the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is the primary regulatory agency enforcing federal securities laws. less -
A&O Shearman

District Of New Jersey Certifies Class Of Investors In Suit Against Healthcare Product Company

A&O Shearman on

On December 28, 2023, Judge Zahid N. Quraishi of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granted class certification in a securities fraud class action, alleging violations of Section 10(b) of the...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

SCOTUS Remands Securities Class Action Back to the 2nd Circuit

On June 21, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System,1 vacating the 2nd Circuit’s previous decision and remanding for further consideration as to...more

Goodwin

House Votes to Repeal OCC True Lender Rule

Goodwin on

In This Issue. The House of Representatives voted to pass a Congressional Review Act resolution repealing the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (OCC) “true lender” rule; the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau...more

Goodwin

SCOTUS Vacates Class Certification In Suit Against Goldman Sachs And Clarifies Appropriate Scope Of Price Impact Evidence

Goodwin on

SCOTUS Vacates Class Certification In Suit Against Goldman Sachs And Clarifies Appropriate Scope Of Price Impact Evidence; Stockholders Strike $110 Million Settlement In Suit Alleging Breaches Of Fiduciary Duties By Former...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Supreme Court Provides Guidance on Class Certification in Securities Class Actions in Goldman Sachs Decision

On June 21, 2021, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, which provides important guidance for defendants seeking to rebut the presumption of...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System: Supreme Court Vacates Class Certification Order in Decade-Long...

On June 21, 2021, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, vacating a decision of the Second Circuit that affirmed certification of a securities...more

UB Greensfelder LLP

SCOTUS Green Lights Price Impact Evidence for Class Cert in Inflation-Maintenance Case

UB Greensfelder LLP on

A decade of litigation in the Goldman Sachs securities fraud class action has ultimately revealed an unremarkable truth, confirmed by a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court – in a case brought under Rule 10b-5 premised on an...more

Bracewell LLP

Supreme Court's Ruling in Goldman Sachs Leaves Open a Path for Securities Fraud Claims Based on Generic ESG Statements

Bracewell LLP on

In April, we analyzed whether a corporation’s purely generic public statements on environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) issues could form the basis of a subsequent securities fraud action. At the time, we identified a...more

Perkins Coie

Supreme Court: “Generic Nature” of Misstatements in Securities Action May Help Defendants Defeat Class Certification

Perkins Coie on

In a significant decision on securities class actions, the U.S. Supreme Court last week held that the generic nature of alleged misrepresentations will often be “important evidence of a lack of price impact” that can be used...more

Jones Day

U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies the Permissible Evidence and Burdens at Class Certification in Securities-Fraud Cases

Jones Day on

The U.S. Supreme Court held that courts should consider the generic nature of a misrepresentation when assessing price impact in securities-fraud suits and that defendants bear the burden of persuasion to prove a lack of...more

BCLP

U.S. Supreme Court: Courts Must Consider Generic Nature of Statements in Considering Certification of Securities Class Action, but...

BCLP on

In a closely followed case concerning class certification in securities fraud class actions, the U. S. Supreme Court has held that the generic nature of a company’s statements should be considered in determining whether such...more

King & Spalding

Supreme Court Addresses Presumption of Reliance in Securities Class Actions

King & Spalding on

On June 21, 2021, the Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, No. 20-222. Goldman concerned the standards to be applied by courts when...more

Goodwin

The Supreme Court Provides Guidance on the Standard for Deciding Price Impact at Class Certification in Securities Fraud Cases

Goodwin on

In Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, the U.S. Supreme Court answered two important questions regarding the standards that govern class certification in securities fraud actions, affirming the...more

Troutman Pepper

US Supreme Court Reverses Class Certification in 10b-5 Action

Troutman Pepper on

On June 21, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, a closely watched case involving the standards for class certification in securities class actions....more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Supreme Court Rules That All Relevant Evidence of Price Impact Matters at Class Certification Stage

On June 21, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. et al. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System et al. The Court held that in ruling on class certification in a securities action,...more

Morgan Lewis

US Supreme Court: Courts to Consider Generic Nature of Alleged Misstatements in Price Impact Analysis

Morgan Lewis on

In Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, the US Supreme Court clarified that courts should consider all record evidence relevant to class certification, regardless of whether that evidence also...more

Stinson LLP

Supreme Court Holds Generic Nature of Statements Must Be Considered With Class Certification

Stinson LLP on

On June 21, 2021, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., et al. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, et al. The case analyzes what the defendants considered were generic statements that did not...more

McGuireWoods LLP

A New Avenue for Defendants in Securities Fraud Class Actions: Supreme Court Holds “Generic” Nature of Statements Is “Important...

McGuireWoods LLP on

Monday, the Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated ruling in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, holding that the generic nature of an alleged misrepresentation may be important evidence of...more

Alston & Bird

Supreme Court Vacates Class Certification in Goldman Suit

Alston & Bird on

Our Securities Litigation Group examines this week’s U.S. Supreme Court decision to vacate a shareholder class action against Goldman Sachs and send it back to a lower court for a closer look at whether alleged misstatements...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Not so Fast in Certifying Class: Supreme Court Holds That Courts Must Consider Generality of Alleged Misstatements in Deciding...

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Goldman Sachs v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Case No. 20-222. But because there was not much “daylight” left between the parties’ arguments by the...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System

On June 21, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, holding that: (1) the generic nature of misrepresentation is often important evidence of price impact that...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Supreme Court Clarifies Basic Presumption Burden and Holds Courts Should Consider All Price Impact Evidence

On June 21, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, No. 20-222 (2021), that courts may consider at the class certification stage the generic nature of alleged...more

Mayer Brown Free Writings + Perspectives

Supreme Court clarifies that in securities-fraud class actions, courts should consider whether the alleged misrepresentation was...

Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, No. 20-222 - Today, the Supreme Court held that in a securities-fraud class action, the district court should consider whether the alleged misrepresentation...more

Stinson - Corporate & Securities Law Blog

Supreme Court Holds Generic Nature of Statements Must Be Considered When Granting Class Certification in Securities Litigation

The Supreme Court issued its decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., et al. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, et al. The case analyzes what the Defendants considered were generic statements that did not have a price...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Supreme Court to Weigh in on Presumption of Reliance in Securities Class Actions: Goldman Sachs v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement...

On March 29, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., et al. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, et al., No. 20-222. The closely-watched case raises a host of important issues...more

29 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide