News & Analysis as of

Securities Fraud Statute of Limitations Supreme Court of the United States

Vinson & Elkins LLP

[Webinar] Redefining Agency Power: The Impact of the Supreme Court’s Decisions in Jarkesy, Loper Bright, and Corner Post - July...

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

Join attorneys in our appellate, energy regulatory, environmental, tax, securities, and employment practices who will explore how these landmark rulings affect administrative law and practice and what comes next....more

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

Environment & Energy Insights (July 2024)

Welcome to the July edition of Nutter’s Environment & Energy Insights, a monthly update of current trends in environment and energy law. The Supreme Court has been busy lately, issuing several opinions that will impact...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP

American Pipe Clarified: Statute of Limitations for Class Actions not tolled by a Prior Motion for Class Certification

In a unanimous decision, the United States Supreme Court held on June 11, 2018 that a pending motion for class certification does not toll the statute of limitations for the filing of a new class action lawsuit by a putative...more

Littler

Supreme Court Year in Review: Union Agency Fees, Travel Restrictions, and the Retirement of Justice Kennedy

Littler on

The U.S. Supreme Court closed out its most recent term, which began in October 2017, with a number of high-profile and ground-breaking decisions. ...more

Amundsen Davis LLC

Good News For Defendants: Supreme Court Rejects Tolling For Class Actions

Amundsen Davis LLC on

On June 11, 2018, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, clarifying the scope of the tolling doctrine triggered by the filing of a class action. The doctrine, as established by earlier Court...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Inside the Courts – An Update From Skadden Securities Litigators - June 2018

This quarter’s issue includes summaries and associated court opinions of selected cases principally decided between February 2018 and May 2018. ...more

Mayer Brown Free Writings + Perspectives

Pending Class Action Does Not Toll Statute of Limitations

The U.S. Supreme Court reached a decision in China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh holding that the equitable tolling rule does not apply to subsequently filed class action claims. ...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Limiting Class Action Tolling: Supreme Court Rules That Filing A Class Action Does Not Toll The Limitations Period For Successive...

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

In China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, the Supreme Court earlier this month held that pending class actions do not toll the limitations period for successive class actions. The ruling limits plaintiffs’ ability to bring successive...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Supreme Court Refuses to Extend American Pipe Tolling to Successive Class Actions

On June 11, 2018, in China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, the United States Supreme Court held that the American Pipe tolling doctrine, which suspends the running of the statute of limitations applicable to the claims of individual...more

Bracewell LLP

In Securities Case, U.S. Supreme Court Curbs Successive Class Actions

Bracewell LLP on

Last week, the United States Supreme Court reigned in plaintiffs’ ability to file new class action suits outside the statute of limitations. The Court decided in China Agritech that, following denial of class...more

McGuireWoods LLP

Supreme Court Rejects Tolling for Copycat Class Actions

McGuireWoods LLP on

Class-action plaintiffs cannot toll the statute of limitations indefinitely by filing copycat class actions until certification sticks, the U.S. Supreme Court held on Monday, June 11, in China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh. The...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

The Supreme Court Narrows Its Holding in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah

The U.S. Supreme Court bars previously absent class members from bringing subsequent class actions outside the applicable limitations period. The Supreme Court’s decision in China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh cements a new limit...more

Jones Day

U.S. Supreme Court: Plaintiffs May Not Piggyback Successive Class Actions Beyond Statute of Limitations

Jones Day on

When does time run out on filing a class action? Under the U.S. Supreme Court's seminal decisions in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah and Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. Parker, a timely class complaint tolls the statute of...more

BakerHostetler

SCOTUS: American Pipe Tolling Does Not Apply to Successive Class Actions

BakerHostetler on

The Supreme Court held unanimously on June 11 that American Pipe tolling does not apply to successive class actions brought outside the statute of limitations. The case, China Agritech v. Resh, resolves a circuit split over...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

New Supreme Court Class Action Ruling A Boon For Employers

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The legal world is abuzz with the ripples created by a recent US Supreme Court decision on the statute of limitations in class actions. A recent post in the Epstein Becker Wage & Hour Defense Blog makes some interesting...more

Moore & Van Allen PLLC

U.S. Supreme Court Says “No” to Plaintiff Attempts to File Repetitive Class Actions After Statute of Limitations Has Run Out

Moore & Van Allen PLLC on

It is easy to overgeneralize the outcome of a legal dispute as pro-plaintiff or pro-defendant to paint a picture of which way a court is leaning and who is finding favor. This week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its second...more

Dechert LLP

Supreme Court Limits American Pipe Tolling for Successive Class Actions

Dechert LLP on

In China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, the Supreme Court of the United States held that the filing of a class action complaint does not toll a statute of limitations period for later-filed class actions raising the same claims. The...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Supreme Court Rules That Class Actions Do Not Toll the Limitations Period For Successive Class Actions

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

In China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, the Supreme Court recently held that pending class actions do not toll the limitations period for successive class actions. The ruling limits plaintiffs’ ability to bring successive class...more

King & Spalding

U.S. Supreme Court Holds American Pipe Does Not Permit Repeat Filing of Class Claims After Limitations Period

King & Spalding on

The United States Supreme Court’s June 11, 2018 decision in China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, clarified the scope of a decades-old equitable tolling rule for class actions, holding that the Court’s 1974 opinion in American Pipe &...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

China Agritech: The Supreme Court Ends Class Action “Stacking”

Foley & Lardner LLP on

This week, in the closely watched case of China Agritech v. Resh, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important class action ruling, holding that the tolling principles announced in its earlier American Pipe decision do not...more

Jackson Walker

Supreme Court Holds That American Pipe Tolling Does Not Apply to Successive Class Actions

Jackson Walker on

Justice Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court in China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, No. 17-342, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan, and Gorsuch joined. Justice Sotomayor filed...more

K&L Gates LLP

No More Zombie Class Actions: Supreme Court Stops Class Members from Filing Successive Class Claims after Expiration of...

K&L Gates LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a plaintiff cannot file a class action outside the applicable statute of limitations merely because an unsuccessful prior class action tolled the limitations period for individual claims....more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

SCOTUS Rules Equitable Tolling Does Not Save Successive Class Action Lawsuits

On June 11, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a landmark decision in China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, addressing a split in the federal circuit courts of appeal, arising from differing applications of the...more

Goodwin

Supreme Court Limits Reach of Tolling Rule, Barring Successive Class Actions After Limitations Period

Goodwin on

In China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the American Pipe class action tolling rule does not suspend the running of applicable limitations periods for later-filed putative class claims where a...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Holds Limitations Period On Class Claims Runs

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

At the start of this week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, No. 17-432 (U.S. June 11, 2018), which has important implications for employers because it will limit their...more

66 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide