News & Analysis as of

Sentencing Supreme Court of the United States

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 21, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued five decisions today: United States v. Rahimi, No. 22-915: This Second Amendment case addresses the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), which makes it a crime for an...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - May 30, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued three decisions today: Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A., No. 22-529: This case addresses the standard for determining when state laws that regulate national banks are...more

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

Sentencing Guidelines Amendment Prevents Judges From Considering Acquitted Conduct at Sentencing

Since the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Watts, 19 US 148 (1997), judges have been permitted to consider acquitted conduct when calculating a defendant’s sentencing guidelines range and determining their...more

Venable LLP

Explaining What "and" Means

Venable LLP on

Everyone knows what "and" means. "And" is not a word you have to look up. So why did the use of "and" in a criminal sentencing statute divide the U.S. Supreme Court? Because the statute's grammatical structure allowed "and"...more

ArentFox Schiff

Investigations Newsletter: SCOTUS Declines to Hear False Claims Act Challenge

ArentFox Schiff on

SCOTUS Declines to Hear False Claims Act Challenge - On January 22, the US Supreme Court denied a petition to hear a challenge to a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision that upheld scienter and False Claims Act (FCA)...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 16, 2023

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued two decisions today: United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., No. 21-1052: This case concerned the scope of the government’s authority to dismiss a...more

King & Spalding

Supreme Court Rejects Government's Broad Use of the Aggravated Identity Theft Statute to Impose Two-Year Mandatory Minimum...

King & Spalding on

The aggravated identity theft statute, 18 U.S.C. §1028A, imposes a mandatory two-year sentencing enhancement upon a defendant who “uses” without lawful authority another’s means of identification “during and in relation to”...more

ArentFox Schiff

Investigations Newsletter: Court Unseals Charges Alleging Nearly $15 Million in Fraudulent PPP Loans

ArentFox Schiff on

Court Unseals Charges Alleging Nearly $15 Million in Fraudulent PPP Loans - Earlier this week, federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York announced the unsealing of a criminal complaint charging six...more

ArentFox Schiff

Investigations Newsletter: Former Theranos Executive Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani Sentenced to Nearly 13 Years

ArentFox Schiff on

Former Theranos Executive Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani Sentenced to Nearly 13 Years - On December 7, 2022, Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, a former Theranos executive, was sentenced to nearly 13 years in prison, and three years of...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Prayer on the 50-Yard Line Doesn’t Draw a Flag, Plus Two Criminal Cases: SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

Coming off the decisions in the landmark Dobbs and Bruen cases, the rest of the term might seem anticlimactic. Nevertheless, as the shelf is being cleared of the remaining cases, there are still rulings of significance to...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - March 28, 2022

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith, No. 21-869: This case concerns the scope of the Copyright Act’s fair use defense. The case arises from Andy Warhols’ artwork that utilized a photo of music legend...more

K&L Gates LLP

Hughes v. United States: After 40 Years, Will the Supreme Court Hit the Marks?

K&L Gates LLP on

How do the lower courts apply a Supreme Court decision when there is no majority opinion to serve as precedent? This problem happens more often than one would think: Four justices take part in a plurality opinion, and one...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - January 16, 2018

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

On Friday afternoon, the Supreme Court granted certiorari and agreed to hear arguments in twelve cases: Animal Science Products v. Hebei Welcome, No. 16-1220: Whether a court may exercise independent review of an appearing...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - May 2016 #3

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued decisions in three cases on May 19, 2016: CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. EEOC, No. 14-1375: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) brought a suit in its own name...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - April 2016 #2

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued one decision on April 18, 2016: - Welch v. United States, No. 15-6418: Last term, the Supreme Court, in Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. __ (2015), held that the residual...more

Melito & Adolfsen

The Connecticut Supreme Court, the U.S. Supreme Court and Pope Francis all address the death penalty

Melito & Adolfsen on

Are alleged sentencing arbitrariness in death penalty cases and a shift in public opinion setting the death penalty on the road to the U.S. Supreme Court? Last year, of the 31 states that allow capital punishment only seven...more

Brooks Pierce

Supreme Court Justices Box The Fourth Circuit's Ears

Brooks Pierce on

Two Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court took the Fourth Circuit to task for not publishing a significant opinion. The ear-boxing came last month in the form of a denial of a Petition for Certiorari from which Justice Thomas...more

17 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide