News & Analysis as of

Significant Nexus Test

Sullivan & Worcester

Federal Appeals Court Strikes Another Blow to Chabad Cultural Property Claims Against Russia

Sullivan & Worcester on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently dismissed a long-running dispute against Russia concerning the library of the Lubavitcher Rebbe (the Library), a collection of books and papers once held by the...more

Lathrop GPM

Corporate Transparency Act Update: Federal District Court Rules CTA Unconstitutional

Lathrop GPM on

Although existing entities covered by the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) should still plan to comply with the beneficial ownership reporting (“BOI”) requirements, a new federal district court ruling offers hope that the...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

New EPA and Corps “waters of the United States” rule conforms to Sackett v. EPA, leaves ambiguities

On September 8, 2023, the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (collectively, the Agencies) published a final rule (Agency Rule) to amend the definition of “waters of the...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Waters of the United States Rule Revised in Response to Sackett Decision

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Aug. 29, 2023, issued a final rulemaking revising the definition of "Waters of the United States" (WOTUS) within Corps1 and EPA2...more

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

EPA and Army Corps Amend Clean Water Act’s “Waters of the United States” Rule

On August 29, 2023, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers released a final rule revising the meaning of “waters of the United States” under the federal Clean Water Act (CWA). The revised...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Waters of the United States/Clean Water Act: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/Corps of Engineers Final Rule Addressing Sackett...

The United States Environmental Protection Agency and the United States Corps of Engineers (collectively “EPA”) issued a pre-Federal Register publication final rule on August 29th revising the Clean Water Act definition of...more

Goldberg Segalla

EPA Redefines ‘Waters of the United States’ to Conform with Supreme Court Decision

Goldberg Segalla on

On August 29, the Environmental Protection Agency announced its final rule amending its definition of “waters of the United States.”  This new definition was written to conform with the Supreme Court’s May 24, 2023 ruling in...more

Bilzin Sumberg

New EPA Rule on Clean Water Act

Bilzin Sumberg on

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released the final Clean Water Act (CWA) rule (New Rule) to comply with the US Supreme Court decision in Sackett v. EPA, 598 U.S. _, 143 S. Ct. 1322 (2023) (“Sackett”).  This is a...more

Nossaman LLP

Biden Administration Finalizes Updated WOTUS Rule

Nossaman LLP on

On August 29, 2023, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) (collectively, the Agencies) released their amendment to January 2023 rule (January 2023 Rule) defining what...more

Akerman LLP

Is That Wetland I Want to Develop "Adjacent"? Key Interpretation in Limbo After Sackett

Akerman LLP on

Last month, the U.S. Supreme Court weighed in on a long-standing controversy over the extent to which the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE; collectively, the Agencies) have...more

Nossaman LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Limits Federal Jurisdiction Over Wetlands

Nossaman LLP on

In a 5-4 decision issued on May 25, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court narrowed the applicability of federal Clean Water Act regulatory authority over wetlands that have a relatively permanent connection to other federal waters....more

Robinson+Cole Environmental Law +

Supreme Court Rules for the Sacketts: The “Significant Nexus” Test is Dead – Long Live “Adjacent Wetlands”

On May 25, 2023, after more than 15 years of fighting, a couple contesting the Environmental Protection Agency’s assertion of jurisdiction over their residential lot as “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) under the Clean...more

WilmerHale

Wetlands and WOTUS: Implications of Sackett v. EPA

WilmerHale on

On May 25, 2023, the United States Supreme Court held that the term “waters of the United States” (“WOTUS”)—as used in the federal Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1362(7)—means “streams, oceans, rivers, and lakes” and...more

BCLP

Marsh Madness: SCOTUS Narrows Wetlands Subject to Clean Water Act in Favor of Regulated Industry and Real Estate Developers

BCLP on

On May 25, 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Sackett v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, diving back into a decades-long debate over the definition of “waters of the United States”...more

McGlinchey Stafford

SCOTUS: Landmark Case Defines Clean Water Act Jurisdiction

McGlinchey Stafford on

On May 25, 2023, the United States Supreme Court significantly curtailed the federal government’s authority to regulate wetlands under the Clean Water Act (CWA) in a 9 to 0 decision. The Court held that the Clean Water Act...more

Stinson LLP

Supreme Court Decision Alters Interpretation of Waters of the United States

Stinson LLP on

The Supreme Court clarified the scope of the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule in a long-awaited decision regarding which wetlands are subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Declining to exercise...more

Venable LLP

Sackett v. EPA: What's Next for Clean Water Act Jurisdiction?

Venable LLP on

Clean Water Act practitioners have spent the past 50 years learning how to identify a wetland or water body that qualifies for federal jurisdiction—and the past 17 parsing the phrase "significant nexus." The upshot was that...more

Downey Brand LLP

Sackett v. EPA: U.S. Supreme Court Redefines Waters of the United States, Eliminating Federal Jurisdiction Over Certain Wetlands...

Downey Brand LLP on

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court released its highly anticipated opinion in Sackett v Environmental Protection Agency, delineating the appropriate standard to determine waters of the United States (WOTUS) under the federal...more

Miller Canfield

SCOTUS Limits USEPA Authority to Regulate Wetlands Under Clean Water Act

Miller Canfield on

In a closely-watched decision, the United States Supreme Court substantially narrowed the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to regulate non-traditional wetlands as "waters of the United States" under...more

Polsinelli

Wetlands Redefined: Supreme Court Narrows Scope of Clean Water Act in Landmark Decision

Polsinelli on

On May 25, 2023, the Supreme Court introduced a new test to determine whether wetlands are subject to Clean Water Act regulation - the “continuous surface connection” test – and in doing so rejected the seventeen-year-old...more

Roetzel & Andress

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Ruling in Sackett v. EPA Overruling EPA’s “Waters of the United States” Rule

Roetzel & Andress on

On May 25, the Court issued a ruling adopting late Justice Scalia’s “continuous surface connection” test for determining jurisdictional waters under the Clean Water Act. The Court’s ruling in Sackett is a decisive shift...more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

Sackett v. EPA: The Supreme Court Clarifies Clean Water Act Jurisdiction

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

On May 25, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Sackett v. EPA, clarifying and narrowing the reach of federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). For decades, confusion has persisted...more

Bricker Graydon LLP

US Supreme Court Issues Decision in Sackett v. EPA Clean Water Act Case

Bricker Graydon LLP on

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in the Sackett v. EPA case, in which it narrowed the test for determining whether wetlands are subject to federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act, thereby...more

Lippes Mathias LLP

WOTUS Rule Finalized: What Does it Mean?

Lippes Mathias LLP on

Following decades of regulatory actions and lawsuits concerning the definition of “waters of the United States under the Clean Water Act, on December 30, 2022, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army...more

Goldberg Segalla

The Clean Water Act’s Not So Clean Application in Close Cases

Goldberg Segalla on

Just last week, on October 3, 2022, Sackett v. EPA found itself once again before the U.S. Supreme Court for oral arguments, its first appearance at SCOTUS having been a decade before. In January 2022, when the Supreme Court...more

35 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide