News & Analysis as of

Standing › Labor Law Violations › Civil Monetary Penalty

Proskauer - California Employment Law

Hot PAGA Summer Rolls on with Another “Win” for Employers

Proskauer - California Employment Law on

The “Summer of PAGA” continued last week when the California Supreme Court ruled in Turrieta v. Lyft, Inc., Case No. S271721, that a plaintiff in a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action does not have standing to...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Legislative Action Heralds Sweeping Changes to PAGA, Resulting in Tools for More Effective Administration and Potential to Curb...

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”) has been increasingly criticized as harmful to employers and employees. Well-meaning organizations are forced to expend resources settling often frivolous actions rather than...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

PAGA Reform: AB 2288 and SB 92 Introduced

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: PAGA reform has officially been introduced in the state Assembly and Senate! The language of the bills were released detailing the most substantive changes to PAGA in its 20-year history. The bills have...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

A Cautionary Comment on PAGA (or Plaintiffs’ Attorneys Getting Around) Legislative Intent

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: Sometimes, plaintiffs’ attorneys have circumvented a key aspect of the California Legislature’s intent in enacting PAGA: limiting standing to pursue penalties for Labor Code violations to those employees...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide