News & Analysis as of

Statutory Violations Debt Collection Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

Troutman Pepper

FTC Halts Debt Collector Over Alleged $7.6 Million Scheme

Troutman Pepper on

Late last month, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed suit against Global Circulation, Inc. (GCI) and its owner for engaging in deceptive and abusive debt collection practices. According to the FTC, the Georgia-based debt...more

Troutman Pepper

Eighth Circuit Vacates Defense Summary Judgment on FDCPA Claim Due to Plaintiff’s Lack of Standing

Troutman Pepper on

Earlier this month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit vacated summary judgment for the defense on various claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) because the plaintiff lacked subject matter...more

Troutman Pepper

California Federal Court Rules Undated Model Debt Violation Notice Does Not Violate the FDCPA

Troutman Pepper on

In March, a district court in the Eastern District of California followed other courts holding that an undated, model form debt validation notice does not violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Specifically,...more

Troutman Pepper

CFPB Amicus Brief Supports FDCPA Claim for Unknowing Stay Violation

Troutman Pepper on

On January 2, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) filed an amicus curiae brief urging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit to reverse a district court’s decision finding that a debt collector lacked the...more

Troutman Pepper

Delaware Bankruptcy Court Enters $30M Stipulated Judgment Over Deceptive Student Loan Practices

Troutman Pepper on

On November 20, Delaware Attorney General (AG) Kathy Jennings, along with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and 11 other states, announced a settlement in excess of $30 million with Prehired LLC and affiliated...more

Troutman Pepper

Undated Model Debt Violation Notice Does Not Violate the FDCPA

Troutman Pepper on

Last week, a district court in Nevada held that an undated, model form debt validation notice does not violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). In Bergida v. PlusFour, Inc., the defendant sent a debt validation...more

Troutman Pepper

New Jersey Federal Court Holds Bank Levy Provides Basis for Standing in FDCPA Case

Troutman Pepper on

On September 15, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey denied the defendant’s summary judgment motion holding instead that a bank levy against the plaintiff served as a basis for standing to assert a claim...more

Troutman Pepper

FCRA Claim for “Misleading” Double-Reporting of Debt by Original Creditor and Collection Agency Survives Motion to Dismiss

Troutman Pepper on

In Hansen v. Mountain America Federal Credit Union, the plaintiff became delinquent on a credit card account with her credit union. The credit union then assigned the debt to a third-party collection agency. Following the...more

Troutman Pepper

Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal of FDCPA Claim for Lack of Standing, Holding Hiring a Lawyer and Confusion is Not Enough

Troutman Pepper on

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed a district court’s dismissal of a suit holding that the plaintiff had not suffered a concrete injury, and therefore, lacked standing to assert a claim under the Fair Debt...more

Troutman Pepper

Indiana Appellate Court Reverses Summary Judgment in FDCPA Case Involving Bona Fide Error Defense

Troutman Pepper on

In a matter involving the bona fide error defense to claims asserted under the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA), an Indiana court of appeals reversed a trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the...more

Foster Swift Collins & Smith

U.S. Court of Appeals Issues Important Ruling on Time Limits to Sue Under Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

On March 1, 2023, the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision with important implications for parties involved in debt collections regulated under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). The decision, in...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

6th Circuit: Each alleged FDCPA violation carries its own statute of limitations

On March 1, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed the dismissal of a debt collection action, holding that every alleged violation of the FDCPA has its own statute of limitations. According to the opinion,...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

District Court says undated collection letter is misleading

On February 9, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida partially granted a defendant debt collector’s motion to dismiss an action alleging an undated collection letter violated various provisions of the...more

Burr & Forman

Third Circuit Finds Vacatur of Default Judgment Does Not Make Collection Activity Retroactively Unlawful

Burr & Forman on

On January 11, 2023, the Third Circuit held that attempting to collect on a default judgment did not constitute using "'false, deceptive, or misleading' representations in connection with collecting the judgment" if the...more

Locke Lord LLP

A Stunning Opinion on “Dunning” ‎Letters: Revised Opinion Following En Banc Review

Locke Lord LLP on

In a revised opinion issued September 8, 2022, an en banc panel of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed last year’s controversial opinion which potentially spelled trouble for debt collectors utilizing third-party...more

Burr & Forman

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Tests for Article III Standing, Changes Course on FDCPA and Mailing Vendors

Burr & Forman on

On September 8, 2022, in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc. , No. 19-14434, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an en banc decision which departs significantly from the panel decision on...more

Burr & Forman

The Tenth Circuit Adopts the “Reasonable Consumer” Standard for FDCPA Claims

Burr & Forman on

In Tavernaro v. Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc., No. 2:20-CV-02141-KHV-ADM, 2022WL3153234 (10th Cir. Aug. 8, 2022), the Tenth Circuit recently held that violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) are to be...more

Burr & Forman

Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal of FDCPA and FCRA Claims Arising from Identity Theft

Burr & Forman on

In Woods v. LVNV Funding, LLC, — F. 4th — (2022), the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of FDCPA and FCRA claims based upon the defendants’ collection and reporting of a fraudulently opened account....more

Burr & Forman

Copycat Case Considers and Rejects Eleventh Circuit FDCPA Ruling

Burr & Forman on

The latest update surrounding Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc., Case No. 19-14434 centers not on the Eleventh Circuit or the Hunstein decision itself but on the district courts nationwide that...more

Burr & Forman

Eleventh Circuit Vacates FDCPA Ruling, Will Rehear Case En Banc

Burr & Forman on

In the latest development in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc., Case No. 19-14434, the full Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated the previous panel’s opinion and will rehear the case en...more

Burr & Forman

Eleventh Circuit Keeps Troublesome FDCPA Ruling Despite Rehearing, Dissent

Burr & Forman on

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has issued its ruling on the motion for rehearing in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc., Case No. 19-14434 but most of the troublesome aspects of the Court’s...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Hunstein II: 11th Circuit Doubles Down on Dubious Conclusion That Mail Vendor Usage Violates FDCPA

In a surprise to many, an arguably rogue panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has now reaffirmed its earlier decision from Hunstein v. Preferred Collection, 994 F.3d 1341, holding that (1) a plaintiff...more

Burr & Forman

Sixth Circuit Dismisses FDCPA Voicemail Case For Lack of Standing

Burr & Forman on

In line with the recent trend of courts giving increased scrutiny to standing in consumer finance cases, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal this week under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”)...more

Burr & Forman

Eleventh Circuit Withholds Mandate in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc.

Burr & Forman on

On June 14, 2021, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a one-line order stating that the Court was withholding issuance of the mandate in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc....more

Burr & Forman

Second Circuit Holds Debt Collector Did Not Need to Include Interest Disclosure in Settlement Offer

Burr & Forman on

In its 2016 decision in Avila v. Riexinger & Associates, LLC, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals held that an attempt to collect a debt that states the current balance owed but does not disclose whether interest and fees are...more

38 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide