News & Analysis as of

Statutory Violations Debt Collectors Financial Services Industry

Troutman Pepper

California Federal Court Rules Undated Model Debt Violation Notice Does Not Violate the FDCPA

Troutman Pepper on

In March, a district court in the Eastern District of California followed other courts holding that an undated, model form debt validation notice does not violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Specifically,...more

Troutman Pepper

CFPB Amicus Brief Supports FDCPA Claim for Unknowing Stay Violation

Troutman Pepper on

On January 2, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) filed an amicus curiae brief urging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit to reverse a district court’s decision finding that a debt collector lacked the...more

Troutman Pepper

Undated Model Debt Violation Notice Does Not Violate the FDCPA

Troutman Pepper on

Last week, a district court in Nevada held that an undated, model form debt validation notice does not violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). In Bergida v. PlusFour, Inc., the defendant sent a debt validation...more

Troutman Pepper

Utah State Court Rejects Claim Based on Debt Collector’s Alleged Failure to Register Under Collection Agency Act

Troutman Pepper on

The Utah court of appeals has recently affirmed the dismissal of a plaintiff’s suit against a debt buyer based on its alleged failure to register as a collection agency prior to filing collection lawsuits. The court’s...more

Troutman Pepper

Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal of FDCPA Claim for Lack of Standing, Holding Hiring a Lawyer and Confusion is Not Enough

Troutman Pepper on

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed a district court’s dismissal of a suit holding that the plaintiff had not suffered a concrete injury, and therefore, lacked standing to assert a claim under the Fair Debt...more

Troutman Pepper

New Jersey Federal Court Dismisses FDCPA Claim Based on Alleged Failure to Obtain Proper License for Lack of Standing

Troutman Pepper on

In Valentine v. Mullooly, Jeffrey, Rooney & Fylnn LLP the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey found that the plaintiff had not suffered an injury in fact and therefore lacked standing to assert a claim under...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

6th Circuit: Each alleged FDCPA violation carries its own statute of limitations

On March 1, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed the dismissal of a debt collection action, holding that every alleged violation of the FDCPA has its own statute of limitations. According to the opinion,...more

Burr & Forman

Third Circuit Finds Vacatur of Default Judgment Does Not Make Collection Activity Retroactively Unlawful

Burr & Forman on

On January 11, 2023, the Third Circuit held that attempting to collect on a default judgment did not constitute using "'false, deceptive, or misleading' representations in connection with collecting the judgment" if the...more

Burr & Forman

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Tests for Article III Standing, Changes Course on FDCPA and Mailing Vendors

Burr & Forman on

On September 8, 2022, in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc. , No. 19-14434, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an en banc decision which departs significantly from the panel decision on...more

Burr & Forman

The Tenth Circuit Adopts the “Reasonable Consumer” Standard for FDCPA Claims

Burr & Forman on

In Tavernaro v. Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc., No. 2:20-CV-02141-KHV-ADM, 2022WL3153234 (10th Cir. Aug. 8, 2022), the Tenth Circuit recently held that violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) are to be...more

Burr & Forman

Copycat Case Considers and Rejects Eleventh Circuit FDCPA Ruling

Burr & Forman on

The latest update surrounding Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc., Case No. 19-14434 centers not on the Eleventh Circuit or the Hunstein decision itself but on the district courts nationwide that...more

Burr & Forman

Eleventh Circuit Vacates FDCPA Ruling, Will Rehear Case En Banc

Burr & Forman on

In the latest development in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc., Case No. 19-14434, the full Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated the previous panel’s opinion and will rehear the case en...more

Burr & Forman

Eleventh Circuit Keeps Troublesome FDCPA Ruling Despite Rehearing, Dissent

Burr & Forman on

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has issued its ruling on the motion for rehearing in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc., Case No. 19-14434 but most of the troublesome aspects of the Court’s...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Hunstein II: 11th Circuit Doubles Down on Dubious Conclusion That Mail Vendor Usage Violates FDCPA

In a surprise to many, an arguably rogue panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has now reaffirmed its earlier decision from Hunstein v. Preferred Collection, 994 F.3d 1341, holding that (1) a plaintiff...more

Burr & Forman

Sixth Circuit Dismisses FDCPA Voicemail Case For Lack of Standing

Burr & Forman on

In line with the recent trend of courts giving increased scrutiny to standing in consumer finance cases, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal this week under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”)...more

Burr & Forman

Eleventh Circuit Withholds Mandate in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc.

Burr & Forman on

On June 14, 2021, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a one-line order stating that the Court was withholding issuance of the mandate in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc....more

Burr & Forman

Second Circuit Holds Debt Collector Did Not Need to Include Interest Disclosure in Settlement Offer

Burr & Forman on

In its 2016 decision in Avila v. Riexinger & Associates, LLC, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals held that an attempt to collect a debt that states the current balance owed but does not disclose whether interest and fees are...more

Adams and Reese LLP

Eleventh Circuit Renews the FDCPA as a Consumer Privacy Statute; Deals Major Blow to Debt Collection Services Industry

Adams and Reese LLP on

Does the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (the FDCPA) apply to communications between a debt collector and its vendors? And, is the FDCPA a consumer privacy statute?  In an apparent issue of first impression, the...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Consumer Financial...

Consumer Law Hinsights – July 2020

Welcome to Consumer Law Hinsights?a monthly compilation of nationwide consumer protection cases of interest to financial services and accounts receivable management companies. This edition highlights our interactive COVID-19...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Consumer Financial...

Consumer Law Hinsights – May 2020

Consumer Law Hinsights is a monthly compilation of nationwide consumer protection cases of interest to financial services and accounts receivable management companies....more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Seventh Circuit holds identification of original and current creditor in debt collection letter did not violate FDCPA

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendants (a debt buyer and a collection agency) in a putative class action that alleged the...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Third Circuit: FDCPA Class Plaintiff who Received QR-Coded Envelope from Debt Collector had Standing Under Spokeo

Ballard Spahr LLP on

In a precedential opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit concluded that a plaintiff in a class action complaint had Article III standing and was properly awarded summary judgment when a debt collector sent...more

22 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide