News & Analysis as of

Statutory Violations Supreme Court of the United States

Polsinelli

Supreme Court Declines to Hear “Willfulness” Case

Polsinelli on

On Monday, October 7, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to consider a petition for certiorari in United States ex rel. Hart v. McKesson Corp., Case No. 23-1293, where relator, Adam Hart (“Relator”), sought review of a...more

Troutman Pepper

Supreme Court Limits SEC’s In-House Adjudication

Troutman Pepper on

On June 27, the U.S. Supreme Court released a 6-3 decision in SEC v. Jarkesy, et al., ending the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) long-standing use of in-house administrative law judge (ALJ) tribunals in cases where...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Important National Bank Act (NBA) preemption case to be argued Today, February 27, before US Supreme Court

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The oral argument in Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A. will be heard on Tuesday, February 27 before the US Supreme Court. The Court recently granted the unopposed motion of the Solicitor General to participate in the oral...more

Troutman Pepper

Supreme Court Holds Government Agencies are Not Immune from FCRA Liability

Troutman Pepper on

On February 8, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service (USDA) v. Kirtz, holding that the Fair Credit Reporting Act’s (FCRA) clear statutory text...more

Epstein Becker & Green

A Big Day at the Court, with a Few Small, Unanimous Decisions - SCOTUS Today

Yesterday might ultimately be remembered as among the most consequential days in the history of the Supreme Court and the nation. That will be determined when a decision in Trump v. Anderson is issued....more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS keeps issue of “tester” standing alive, dismissing ADA website appeal as moot

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On December 5, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States in Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer, declined to substantively address a question businesses across the country have been eager to resolve: That is, whether a “tester”...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Do ADA Testers Have Standing? SCOTUS Takes the Easy Way Out - SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

Although the Supreme Court already has heard a number of significant arguments, this term has not yet seen any major substantive opinions. This is not to say that there isn’t a lot going on at, or on the way to, the Court....more

CDF Labor Law LLP

With Fourth and Inches, SCOTUS Punts Standing Issue of ADA Accommodation “Testers”

CDF Labor Law LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) issued its much anticipated ruling in Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer vacating the matter as moot. Doing so, SCOTUS left private business owners grappling with the existing...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

SCOTUS Punts on Whether ADA “Testers” Have Standing in Acheson v. Laufer

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis:  SCOTUS’s refusal to clarify standing requirements for “tester” plaintiffs in ADA Title III lawsuits means it’s business as usual for the plaintiffs’ bar....more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - December 5, 2023

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued one decision: Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer, No. 22-429: Deborah Laufer sued hundreds of hotels under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

SCOTUS Hears Oral Argument in Acheson v. Laufer

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis:  SCOTUS asked revealing questions in Wednesday's Acheson v. Laufer oral argument, but left attendees wondering whether the Court will provide much-needed guidance on the so-called “tester standing” issue...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Seventh Circuit Holds FTC Act Does not Allow Disgorgement to U.S. Treasury

Ballard Spahr LLP on

In FTC v. Credit Bureau Center, LLC, the Seventh Circuit recently held that Section 19 of the Federal Trade Commission Act does not allow the FTC to deposit excess funds awarded as restitution under Section 19 in the U.S....more

Carlton Fields

11th Circuit Stands Alone in Barring All Class Incentive Awards

Carlton Fields on

Nearly three years after its decision in Johnson v. NPAS Solutions LLC, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals remains the only circuit in the nation to categorically bar class representatives from receiving incentive awards....more

Troutman Pepper

Nursing Homes, Beware! Supreme Court Greenlights Civil Lawsuits to Enforce FNHRA

Troutman Pepper on

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Indiana, et al. v. Talevski has raised the stakes for nursing homes by ruling that private litigants may bring civil claims against...more

Bilzin Sumberg

U.S. Supreme Court to Decide Future of ADA Hotel Litigation

Bilzin Sumberg on

Earlier this week, the U.S. Supreme Court announced it will hear the case of Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer  and finally resolve the question of whether “tester” plaintiffs have standing to sue a hotel company that fails to...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

SCOTUS Agrees to Resolve A Circuit Split on Tester Standing in ADA Title III Cases

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: SCOTUS grants certiorari on an ADA Title III case for the first time in 18 years to resolve a circuit split on whether an ADA plaintiff has standing to sue without having any intention of frequenting the...more

CDF Labor Law LLP

California Private Employers Who Engage in Diversity Efforts Should Be Paying Attention to UNC and Harvard Affirmative Action...

CDF Labor Law LLP on

In ten days, on October 31, 2022, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in two very important affirmative action education cases. In Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College (Harvard), the plaintiffs...more

Kohrman Jackson & Krantz LLP

State Agencies Not Immune From Federal Uniformed Services Employment And Reemployment Rights Act Claims

In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court held state agencies are not immune from claims brought under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) in the case Torres v. Texas Department of...more

Quarles & Brady LLP

High Court Rules “State of Mind” Relevant in Prosecuting Prescribers under the Controlled Substance Act

Quarles & Brady LLP on

Last week the Supreme Court ("the Court") released a decision holding that the Federal Controlled Substance Act (the "Act") provision that criminalizes the dispensing of a controlled substance “except as authorized” includes...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Supreme Court To Decide Standard For Government Dismissal Of False Claims Act Cases

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The Supreme Court granted certiorari in a case that will decide two important questions under the False Claims Act (FCA).  In United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., the Relator asks the Court to...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

Supreme Court To Hear Case Regarding Section 1983 Enforcement of FNHRA Violations

The Supreme Court, on May 2, 2022, granted certiorari to consider whether certain provisions in the Federal Nursing Home Reform Act (“FNHRA”) create rights that are federally enforceable by nursing home residents under 42...more

Littler

U.S. Supreme Court Excludes Emotional Distress Damages from Remedies Available Under Rehabilitation Act and Affordable Care Act

Littler on

On April 28, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court narrowed the scope of damages available under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehab Act) and the Affordable Care Act (ACA). In a 6-3 decision, the Court held that emotional distress...more

Robinson & Cole LLP

Spotlight on Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College

Robinson & Cole LLP on

Nearly forty-five years after its decision in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, the Supreme Court appears poised to overturn or significantly depart from its prior approval of the use of race as a “plus...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed

HIGH COURT ORDERS RETHINK OF $9.7M AWARD AFTER TRANSUNION

The Supreme Court on Monday signaled to the lower courts that they need to seriously consider the impact of TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 594 U.S. ___ (2021) when addressing claims for statutory violations that do not result in...more

Proskauer - Minding Your Business

Do All Class Members Have Standing For Mere Statutory Violations? The Supreme Court Will Decide

On March 30, the Supreme Court will hear arguments on whether a damages class action, is permitted by Article III of the Constitution or Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure where the majority of the class has...more

50 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide