News & Analysis as of

The Copyright Act › Artificial Intelligence › Corporate Counsel

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

District Court Adopts Broad View of Copyright Preemption in Data Scraping Case

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

The recent California district court decision dismissing the complaint in X Corp. v. Bright Data Ltd. could have significant implications for companies that rely on their terms of use to prohibit unauthorized “data scraping”...more

Willcox & Savage

Court Dismisses Most Claims In Two AI Copyright Cases

Willcox & Savage on

The U.S. District Court for the North District of California dismissed four of six claims in a pair of cases alleging that the use by OpenAI, Inc. of the plaintiffs’ books infringed the copyrights in those books. Tremblay v....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

The New York Times Case against OpenAI is Different. Here's Why.

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

On December 27, 2023, The New York Times Company ("The Times") sued several OpenAI entities and their stakeholder Microsoft ("OpenAI") in the Southern District of New York for copyright infringement, vicarious copyright...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Motion To Dismiss Ruling Provides Insight Into How Courts View AI Training Data Cases

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

A recent decision by a California district court in J. Doe 1 v. GitHub, Inc., a case brought by computer programmers alleging that their works had been used to train AI models that generate computer code in violation of their...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide