News & Analysis as of

Third-Party Beneficiaries Merger Agreements

Troutman Pepper

Delaware Court of Chancery Addresses Enforceability of Con Ed Provision

Troutman Pepper on

In Crispo v. Musk, the Delaware Court of Chancery considered the enforceability of a so-called “Con Ed” provision contained in a merger agreement governing the well-publicized and troubled acquisition of Twitter, Inc....more

McDermott Will & Emery

Delaware Opens the Door to Third-Party Beneficiaries

McDermott Will & Emery on

Based on a recent Delaware Chancery Court decision, parties outside of a transaction—not just the buyer or seller—may be able to enforce continuing employment provisions in a purchase agreement. This decision shows that a...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Blurring the Lines: Dolan v. Altice Demonstrates the Potentially Unexpected and Significant Impact that “Boilerplate” Provisions...

In a recent decision arising out of the sale of Cablevision, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued important guidance regarding the interplay between what are commonly regarded as boilerplate merger agreement provisions and...more

Locke Lord LLP

Delaware Court of Chancery Confirms Ability of Stockholders to Assert Third-Party Beneficiary Claims Under Merger Agreements

Locke Lord LLP on

A common provision in merger agreements is denial of the right of non-parties to the agreement to assert third-party beneficiary claims. The use of this provision left open the question whether stockholders of a disappearing...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide