News & Analysis as of

Toxic Chemicals Enforcement Proposition 65

Greenberg Glusker LLP

Will Makeup Get a Makeover?: Titanium Dioxide in Cosmetics

Greenberg Glusker LLP on

UPDATE: On June 12, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California entered a preliminary injunction in The Personal Care Products Council v. Bonta....more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Up In Smoke – CA Court of Appeal Dismisses Prop 65 Case Against Water Pipe Manufacturer Narrowly Construing The Term “Expose”

California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Health & Safety Code § 25249.5 et seq.) (“Prop 65”) is a California law that prohibits any person in the course of doing business from “knowingly and...more

Vedder Price

The Long Reach of Proposition 65

Vedder Price on

According to the Center for Accountability in Science, since 2010, businesses have spent over $182 million to settle Prop 65 lawsuits. What most companies do not realize is that 75% of settling businesses were headquartered...more

BCLP

Updated PFAS State Snapshot: California PFAS Regulation

BCLP on

California is one of several states that has started regulating per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) in drinking water and consumer products.  This updated client alert reflects the status of PFAS regulations in...more

Miller Starr Regalia

Warning: Non-Compliance With California’s New Proposition 65 Safe Harbor Rules May Expose You To Liability. For More Information

Miller Starr Regalia on

The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act, popularly known as “Proposition 65” (or “Prop. 65”), requires businesses to warn California residents before exposing them to specified chemicals. ...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide