News & Analysis as of

Tyler v Hennepin County Minnesota Property Owners

Bricker Graydon LLP

Land banking after Tyler: No government taking where there’s a process (so says federal 6th Cir.)

Bricker Graydon LLP on

Land banking advocates across the country took notice of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Tyler v. Hennepin County that found a “government taking” occurred when a Minnesota county sold a tax-foreclosed home to recover...more

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

Reacting to Tyler v. Hennepin County: Massachusetts Passes Surplus Funds Revisions

In a landmark shift towards protecting delinquent taxpayer’s interest in surplus funds generated from tax lien foreclosures, Massachusetts enacted a law as a part of its 2025 budget to revise the way surplus funds are...more

Sullivan & Worcester

Zoning and Development Newsletter - July 2023

Sullivan & Worcester on

Sullivan's Permitting & Land Use Practice Group and Litigation Department have released the second issue of their Zoning and Development Newsletter. The publication aims to provide our firm's clients and others interested...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Supreme Court Holds Property Owners Can Recover Surpluses From Tax Sales As Unconstitutional Takings

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Summary - In Tyler v. Hennepin County, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that a county’s retention of the excess value of a home in a tax sale violated the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The decision, which...more

Harris Beach Murtha PLLC

U.S. Supreme Court Limits Municipalities from Retaining Excess Value in Tax Foreclosures

On May 25, 2023, the United States Supreme Court, in Tyler v. Hennepin County, ruled it is unconstitutional for municipalities to unilaterally retain the surplus monies generated from tax lien foreclosure sales. More...more

Snell & Wilmer

U.S. Supreme Court Reinforces Property Owners' Rights to Excess Sales Proceeds After the Sale of Seized Land

Snell & Wilmer on

On May 25, 2023, the United States Supreme Court, in Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota, et al., reaffirmed the general principle that a creditor that has seized property to satisfy a debt is not entitled to the remaining...more

Epstein Becker & Green

A Big Day for the Little Guy – SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

With essential unanimity, though with an array of concurrences in one of them, the Supreme Court ruled against government parties in three cases, two of them in favor of homeowners, and in property rights and environmental...more

7 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide