News & Analysis as of

United States Patent and Trademark Office › Supreme Court of the United States › CLS Bank v Alice Corp

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is an agency of the United States Department of Commerce that serves a fundamental role in the U.S. intellectual property system by issuing patents and registering trademarks.... more +
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is an agency of the United States Department of Commerce that serves a fundamental role in the U.S. intellectual property system by issuing patents and registering trademarks.    less -
Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Is Your Blockchain Invention Patentable?

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints on

Blockchain is becoming central to more FinTech patent portfolios than ever – but it’s harder to obtain protection on blockchain than most other technologies. The US Supreme Court’s decision in Alice v. CLS Bank (2014)...more

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

What Patent Bills Would Mean for Infringement Litigation

Farella Braun + Martel LLP on

Two bills recently introduced in Congress could significantly affect the current patent litigation landscape. The bipartisan bills are titled the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2023 and the Promoting and Respecting...more

ArentFox Schiff

Patenting AI: How US Patent System Evolves To Keep Up With the AI Revolution

ArentFox Schiff on

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in recent years has been accompanied by a surge in patent filings by AI developers. But like many other emerging technologies before it, AI inventions face patent...more

ArentFox Schiff

Patent Considerations and the Metaverse

ArentFox Schiff on

The Metaverse presents a variety of possibilities: from technology that enables digital content to be laid over the real world to application of real-world characteristics to a purely online environment. It is also a...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

The Supreme Court Sidesteps America's Patent Eligibility Crisis

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

In an order that is clearly less impactful and damaging than a number of opinions that the Supreme Court has disgorged in the last two weeks, the justices have denied certiorari in American Axle & Mfg. Inc. v. Neapco Holdings...more

Weintraub Tobin

USPTO Requests Input On Patent Eligibility From Critical Sectors Impacted By Current Law

Weintraub Tobin on

In recent years, the Supreme Court has decided a number of cases, including Bilski v. Kappos, Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. Prometheus Labs., Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad, and Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l, which...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

The Three Properties of Patent-Eligibility: An Empirical Study

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Patent eligibility is a bit of a mess these days.  Ever since the Supreme Court handed down the Alice v. CLS Bank decision six years ago, the distinction between what might be subject matter that can be patented and what is...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Adjusting to Alice: USPTO’s View of Its Examination Guidelines

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court’s Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, 573 U.S. 208 (2014) (“Alice”) held that technologies that merely implemented an abstract idea with a generic computer were not eligible for patent...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

What is an Abstract Idea, Anyway?

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

In 2014's Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l case, Justice Thomas famously wrote, "we need not labor to delimit the precise contours of the 'abstract ideas' category in this case."  Instead, he found the claims of patentee Alice...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

The Zombie Apocalypse of Patent Eligibility Reform and a Possible Escape Route

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

The hopes of anyone in favor of patent reform targeting 35 U.S.C § 101 have been official dashed -- or at least put on hold.  In an interview with the Intellectual Property Owner's association (IPO) last week, Senator Thom...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

The Uncertain Future of Patent Eligibility

Womble Bond Dickinson on

For many companies in many industries, patents are an important tool for driving innovation. At the same time, patents limit competition, so that companies must also be wary of their competitors’ patent portfolios. The result...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

New USPTO Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Seeks to Standardize Abstract Idea Analysis

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The Supreme Court’s decisions in Mayo v. Prometheus and Alice Corp v. CLS Bank created a three-part test for determining subject matter eligibility of patent claims under 35 U.S.C. §101 that has unfortunately led to...more

Knobbe Martens

USPTO Revises Examination Procedure after Berkheimer

Knobbe Martens on

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has issued new guidance to patent examiners in light of the Federal Circuit’s recent holdings in Berkheimer v. HP Inc., 881 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2018) and Aatrix Software, Inc. v. Green...more

Vedder Price

Overcoming Early Alice Rejections in Litigation

Vedder Price on

In 2014, the United States Supreme Court in a landmark decision in the field of Patent Law (Alice Corp. v. CLS Int’l) invalidated software patents related to mitigating settlement risk. Relying on the now-infamous Section...more

McAfee & Taft

Two-step analysis to assist in determining patent eligibility

McAfee & Taft on

Napoleon Hill once famously said, “Whatever the mind of man can conceive and believe, it can achieve.” However, what the mind of man can conceive is not necessarily patentable. Courts have long held that laws of nature,...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Exergen Corp. v. Kaz USA, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2018)

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

The tortured path that the Federal Circuit has taken (a path also trodden by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the district courts) of applying the patent eligibility decisions under Mayo Collaborative Services v....more

McDermott Will & Emery

Unclaimed Features Cannot Save Eligibility of Claims

McDermott Will & Emery on

Adhering to its now-familiar two-step framework for determining patent eligibility under the Supreme Court of the United States’ 2014 decision in Alice (IP Update, Vol. 17, No. 7), the US Court of Appeals for the Federal...more

Fenwick & West LLP

USPTO's Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Roundtable on Dec. 5, 2015

Fenwick & West LLP on

On December 5, 2016 the USPTO will hold its second Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Roundtable to discuss issues in patent eligibility. The USPTO published a list of eighteen questions in anticipation of the event, dealing...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Intellectual Property Law - July 2016

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on

Supreme Court: Status Quo in Cuozzo - Why it matters: On June 20, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. Lee, where it rejected challenges to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Will The Celsis Appeal Put An End To 101 Rejections Of Laboratory Method Claims?

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On April 5, 2016, the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in Rapid Litigation Mgmt. Ltd. v. CellzDirect Inc., where the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois held invalid claims directed to a “method of...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Vehicle Intelligence v. Mercedes-Benz: Ineligibility as a Proxy for Lack of Enablement

Fenwick & West LLP on

The Federal Circuit has issued six decisions since December 1, 2015, all of course invalidating the patents in suit, four per curiam (Clear With Computers v. Altec Indus; Cloud Satchel v. Amazon.com; Wireless Media...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Top Five Stories of 2015

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

After reflecting upon the events of the past twelve months, Patent Docs presents its ninth annual list of top patent stories. For 2015, we identified twenty stories that were covered on Patent Docs last year that we believe...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Intellectual Property Law - December 2015

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on

Down the Rabbit Hole: Trends in Software Patent Court Decisions Post-Alice - Why it matters: In Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, the U.S. Supreme Court held that claims for a computer-based software method for reducing...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

MacroPoint, LLC v. FourKites, Inc. (N.D. Ohio 2015)

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

In a previous article on the USPTO's publication of its 2014 Interim Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility, we wrote: Despite the Interim Guidance offering a reasonably fair and thorough overview of the current...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Comments on the USPTO's Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance -- BSA

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

On July 30, 2015, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office updated its subject matter eligibility guidance ("July Update"). In the July Update, the Office provided recommendations and resources for examiners in addition to those...more

63 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide