News & Analysis as of

Workplace Injury Expert Testimony Workers' Compensation Claim

Marshall Dennehey

Commonwealth Court Affirms Denial of Claim Petition That Alleged Occupational Disease of Lead Toxicity

Marshall Dennehey on

Jerry Mercer v. Active Radiator MPN, Inc. (WCAB); No. 1326 C.D. 2023; filed June 3, 2024; Judge Fizzano Cannon - On August 24, 2018, the claimant advised the employer that he had sustained a work-related injury due to lead...more

Marshall Dennehey

Superior Court Affirms Decision Denying Claimant’s Motion to Strike Medical Expert Testimony Regarding Medical Records Produced...

Marshall Dennehey on

Trincia v. Dick’s Sporting Goods, 2024 WL 1110401 (Del. Super. Mar. 14, 2024) - Ms. Trincia filed a Petition to Determine Compensation Due that alleged she injured her cervical spine and left shoulder in a work accident on...more

Marshall Dennehey

Appellate Division Finds No Reason to Disturb Employer’s Experts’ Qualifications, to Not Accept Their Testimony, and Rejects Claim...

Marshall Dennehey on

Bello v. United Panam Financial Corp., No. A-2986-21 (Mar. 6, 2024) - The pro se petitioner appealed from a workers’ compensation order finding that his injuries were not causally related to his employment. The petitioner...more

Cranfill Sumner LLP

All About the Experts: Rebutting the Parsons Presumption

Cranfill Sumner LLP on

The Thornton decision is guided by the Parsons presumption, which holds that when additional medical treatment for a compensable injury is required, a rebuttable presumption arises in favor of the claimant that the treatment...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide