State Level PFAS Regulations Are Coming: Are You Ready?

Holland & Hart LLP
Contact

Holland & Hart LLP

As the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) expands its regulation of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a number of states have also taken steps to regulate the use, production, and sale of products containing PFAS. PFAS are a group of synthetic chemicals with a broad range of commercial and industrial uses. Adopted and proposed state legislation may require entities that have PFAS in their products to report such contents, age-restrict the distribution of their products, or even, cease the sale of PFAS-containing products entirely.

It is critical to understanding how a state defines PFAS and whether (and how) any of the requirements apply to your product. It’s complicated: Some states are legislating PFAS as a class using a very broad definition, while others are targeting specific PFAS chemicals. Commercial and industrial producers should be aware of any new obligations that may affect their business practices.

The chart below outlines adopted and proposed regulatory efforts as of early May:

STATE LABELING REQUIREMENTS.

State

Regulation

California

Required: Labeling for all products containing the PFAS compounds PFOA, PFOS, and PFNA at levels above set limits.

Michigan

Proposed: Legislation requiring labeling for any product containing PFAS by January 2025.

 

STATE NOTIFICATION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

State

Regulation

Washington

Required: Manufacturers must submit written notice and relevant product information for PFAS-containing products.

Maine

Upcoming Requirement:

  • As of January 2022, written notice and relevant product information for PFAS-containing products required for manufacturers that intentionally add PFAS to a product as a “currently unavoidable use.”
  • Provision in law that would waive reporting requirements.

Minnesota

Upcoming Requirement: As of January 2022, written notice and relevant product information for PFAS-containing products required for manufacturers that intentionally add PFAS to a product as a “currently unavoidable use.”

 

New York

Requirement: Reporting where PFAS compounds are used in children’s products or products marketed towards children.

Oregon

Requirement:

  • Reporting where PFAS compounds are used in children’s products or products marketed towards children.
  • Product reports on PFOS and PFOA use every two years

Proposed: Phase out of PFAS compounds used in children’s products or products marketed towards children unless an exemption is granted.

 

Vermont

Requirement:

  • Reporting where PFAS compounds are used in children’s products or products marketed towards children.
  • List of PFAS compounds of high concern to children expanded to include PFHxS, PFHpA and PFNA.
  • Exemption of notice requirement for companies that have implemented a control program and have attempted to minimize PFAS contamination in children’s products

 

Connecticut

Proposed:

  • Legislation requiring that manufacturers report products containing PFAS.
  • A penalty system where failure to report may result in product bans.

New Jersey

Proposed:

  • Legislation requiring that manufacturers report products containing PFAS.

Note: If this legislation is passed, reporting requirements would go into effect one year after passage.

Wisconsin

Proposed:

  • Legislation requiring that manufacturers report products containing PFAS.

Note: If this legislation is passed, Wisconsin proposes an effective reporting date of January 2028.

 

LIMITED BANS ON PFAS-CONTAINING PRODUCTS

State

Regulation

California

Requirement: Ban of intentionally added PFAS in products intended for children or marketed to children.

Colorado

Requirement:

  • Ban of intentionally added PFAS in products intended for children or marketed to children.
  • Ban of the sale and distribution of other product categories, such as carpeting, food packaging and oil and gas products if they contain PFAS compounds.

Proposed : Legislation pending the Governor’s signature would ban other product categories including cookware, apparel, and certain cleaning products.

Minnesota

Requirement:

  • Ban of certain PFAS-containing products.

Upcoming Requirement: In January 2025, ban of intentionally added PFAS in children’s products .

New York

Requirement: Ban of certain PFAS-containing products.

Upcoming Requirement: In January 2026, ban of PFAS in products designed for children and other consumer products.

Washington

Requirement: Ban of certain PFAS-containing products.

Upcoming Requirement: In January 2025, ban on specific categories of consumer products containing PFAS.

Massachusetts

Proposed:

  • Legislation to ban certain categories of products containing PFAS from sale or distribution and ban the sale of all children’s products that contain PFAS.

New Hampshire

Proposed:

  • Legislation to ban certain categories of products containing PFAS from sale or distribution.
  • The implementation of a fee program to encourage phase-out and later a total ban of PFAS in all product packaging.

Rhode Island

Proposed:

  • Legislation to ban certain categories of products containing PFAS from sale or distribution.
  • Legislation to ban the sale of children’s products containing PFAS as of January 2027.

Wisconsin

Proposed:

  • Legislation which would ban certain categories of products containing PFAS from sale or distribution.
  • Ban on the use of PFAS in children’s products with an effective date of January 2028.

 

TOTAL BANS ON PFAS-CONTAINING PRODUCTS

State

Regulation

Maine

Requirement:

  • By January 1, 2026, certain products such as, cleaning products, cookware, cosmetic products, dental floss, juvenile products, menstruation products, textile articles, ski wax, and upholstered furniture can no longer be sold.
  • By January 1, 2029, certain apparel with intentionally added PFAS will also be phased out from sale.
  • Total ban on PFAS products extended from January 1, 2025 to January 1, 2032.

Massachusetts

Proposed:

  • Legislation to ban the use of PFAS in all consumer products as of January 2027

Tennessee

Proposed:

  • Legislation to ban the use of PFAS in all consumer products, with exemption for certain products.

Wisconsin

Proposed:

  • Legislation to ban products containing PFAS, with limited exceptions, in 2034.

As state requirements and proposals continue to evolve, it is important for owners and operators in affected industries to proactively monitor the status of developments in states where they operate. Compliance in this area is complex. Many of the bans or reporting requirements also apply to e-commerce. And disposal of any product containing PFAS warrants careful consideration.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Holland & Hart LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Holland & Hart LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Holland & Hart LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide