Sunstein LLP

Contact
Share
Info
100 High Street
Boston, MA 02110-1618, United States
Phone: (617) 443-9292
Fax: (617) 443-0004
Areas Of Practice
  • Art, Entertainment, & Sports Law
  • Business Organizations
  • Commercial Law & Contracts
  • Communications & Media Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Law & Trade
  • Litigation
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Privacy
  • Science, Computers, & Tech
Locations
Other U.S. Locations
  • Massachusetts
Number of Attorneys
25-50 Attorneys

Trade Secret Damages Beyond the Actual Loss Suffered by Plaintiffs Become Harder to Obtain

The Southern District of New York vacates nearly $200 million in damages after remand from Second Circuit - On March 13, 2024, in Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Ltd. v. The TriZetto Group Inc., the Federal District Court…more
 /  Business Torts, Civil Remedies, Intellectual Property

A Large Theft of Trade Secrets Sets a Record: The “Largest Damages Award on the books under the DTSA”

Sometimes it is all about the money. In Motorola v. Hytera, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals addressed “a large and blatant theft of trade secrets” from Motorola by its competitor Hytera. The damages awarded to Motorola,…more
 /  Business Torts, Intellectual Property

The Court of Appeals of Virginia Overturns Record $2 Billion Jury Award in Widely Watched Appian v. Pegasystems Trade Secret Litigation

On July 30, 2024, the Court of Appeals of Virginia overturned a two billion dollar (yes, billion with a ‘b’) jury verdict in the Appian v. Pegasystems trade secret lawsuit. Although the Court of Appeals upheld the verdict of…more
 /  Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Enforcing a Non-Compete Against a Former Employee in California

What happens when a senior executive leaves a Massachusetts company, with which he has a non-compete, to go to work for a competitor in California, which forbids most non-competes? This question was front and center when…more
 /  Business Organizations, Commercial Law & Contracts, Conflict of Laws, Labor & Employment Law

FTC Ban on Non-Competes Thwarted by Texas Federal Court

Since it was announced in May 2024, the impending FTC ban on non-competes has been mired in controversy. The Rule, which was set to go into effect on September 4, 2024, was intended to ban nearly all non-competition agreements…more
 /  Administrative Law, Business Organizations, Civil Procedure, Commercial Law & Contracts, Labor & Employment Law

Federal Circuit Upends Obviousness Test for Design Patents, Leaving Uncertainty and Potential Opportunity

On May 21, 2024, the Federal Circuit upended decades of precedent regarding design patents in its decision LKQ Corporation v. GM Global Technology Operations LLC. Sitting en banc, a panel of Federal Circuit judges overturned the…more
 /  Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Coping With the FTC Ban on Non-Competition Agreements

On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission issued its long-expected non-compete ban (the “Rule”). The Rule, which is scheduled to go into effect on September 4, 2024, will ban nearly all non-competes across the country…more
 /  Administrative Law, Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Commercial Law & Contracts, Labor & Employment Law

The Kessler Doctrine: An Expanded Form of Preclusion Unique to Patent Litigation

Late last year, the Federal Circuit affirmed an award of over $5 million in attorneys’ fees in favor of the defendants in PersonalWeb v. Patreon. In addressing the propriety of the award, the Federal Circuit also took the…more
 /  Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Sage Therapeutics Prevails in USPTO: Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Opposition to SAGEFORTH Mark

The USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board issued a precedential decision on April 12, 2024, in favor of Sage Therapeutics, finding a likelihood of confusion between Sage’s SAGE CENTRAL mark and the mark SAGEFORTH, and refused…more
 /  Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Tacking in Trademark Law: Even Big Brands Sometimes Miss the Mark

Trademark law continues to be the cornerstone of brand identity. One concept that introduces a unique set of challenges in trademark law is “tacking.” Tacking is the ability of a trademark owner to modify their mark without…more
 /  Business Organizations, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

USPTO Proposes New Rules on Terminal Disclaimers: A Potential Setback for Patentees

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently proposed a significant change to the rules governing terminal disclaimers. The USPTO says that the rule change would “promote innovation and competition,” but is…more
 /  Administrative Law, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Supreme Court Rules that Copyright Infringement Claims: Can Cover Decades of Damages

The Copyright Act requires that an infringement action be brought, if at all, within three years of the accrual of the claim. This requirement often limits the period for which damages can be recovered. As a recent Supreme Court…more
 /  Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

What’s in a Voice: How the Law is Being Used to Combat Deepfakes

While it may be amusing to hear a deepfake of President Biden singing “Baby Shark,” AI voice technology can just as easily be used for nefarious purposes, such as scams, extortion, and spreading misinformation. The ultimate harm…more
 /  Administrative Law, Intellectual Property, Privacy, Science, Computers, & Technology

The Overlooked Claim of The New York Times v. OpenAI: Harm to Copyright Management Information

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) was passed by Congress in 1988 to provide solutions for the strained relationship between the internet and copyright law. It focused on protecting copyright owners whose works were…more
 /  Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Trial Court Ruling Threatens Patent Portfolio Development

A recent decision by a San Francisco federal district court judge imperils the way many significant patent portfolios are developed. In Sonos v. Google, Judge William Alsup held that two patents asserted by Sonos against Google…more
 /  Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property
Showing 1-15 of 143 Results
/
View per page
Page: of 10
This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide