News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Petrella v. MGM

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
ArentFox Schiff

US Supreme Court Holds No Limit to Number of Years for Which Copyright Infringement Damages Are Recoverable Under the “Discovery...

ArentFox Schiff on

For copyright infringement lawsuits timely filed by plaintiffs availing themselves of the “discovery rule” — to determine when their infringement claims accrued — the US Supreme Court has issued a decision concerning the...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Supreme Court Clarifies That Copyright Damages Are Not Limited to Three Years Before Filing of an Infringement Claim

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

On May 9, 2024, in Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that a copyright owner is entitled to monetary relief for timely infringement claims — i.e., claims brought within the Copyright Act’s...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Copyright Plaintiffs Prevail: Supreme Court Upholds Broad Damages Under Discovery Rule in Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP on

On May 9, 2024, the Supreme Court released its decision in Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy, a case with significant implications for damages available to plaintiffs in copyright infringement claims. The Court assumed, without...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

MarkIt to Market® - February 2024

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on

Thank you for reading the February 2024 issue of Sterne Kessler's MarkIt to Market® newsletter. This month, we discuss the advertising rights of luxury resellers and important updates to the Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Skeptical of the Second Circuit: U.S. Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Copyright Damages

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy, an appeal of the Eleventh Circuit’s determination that a copyright plaintiff can recover damages for infringement occurring more...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Time's Up: Supreme Court to Grapple with Damages Dilemma in Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on

On February 21, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in Warner Chappell Music, Inc. et al. v. Nealy et al. The case involves whether plaintiff music producer Sherman Nealy may recover damages for...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Key SCOTUS Decisions in Tech – First Half 2017

Fenwick & West LLP on

Despite being short one justice for much of the year, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down multiple significant decisions this past term that can unsettle long-standing legal understandings in multiple technology fields. These...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

What do Raging Bull and Adult Diapers Have in Common?

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Apparently, quite a bit according to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has dipped its toe into the waters of intellectual property law again and has decided to overturn 150 years or more of common law precedent in its...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

SCA Hygiene Case Provides a Clear Win for Patent Owners

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP on

In SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC, the Supreme Court last week overruled the Federal Circuit’s en banc decision that laches (unreasonable delay in bringing a claim) can bar recovery of...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Litigation Alert: Supreme Court Extends Petrella Rule Barring Laches to Patent Context

Fenwick & West LLP on

Three years ago, in Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., the Supreme Court held that the equitable defense of laches is not available against copyright claims for damages brought within the Copyright Act’s three-year...more

Ladas & Parry LLP

Laches not available to defeat patent infringement damages claim: SCA Hygiene Products v First Quality Baby Products

Ladas & Parry LLP on

In a 7-1 decision on March 21, 2017, in the case of SCA Hygiene Products AB v. First Quality Baby Products LLC, the United States Supreme Court reversed an en banc decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and...more

Akerman LLP - Marks, Works & Secrets

Laches Limited To Being An Equitable Defense In Patent Cases

Akerman LLP - Marks, Works & Secrets on

In SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC, the Supreme Court made plain that laches is merely an equitable defense in patent cases, and will not bar a damage claim if brought within the six year...more

Proskauer - New England IP Blog

Supreme Court Rejects Laches Defense in Patent Cases

Proskauer - New England IP Blog on

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled this week that laches is not a defense in the majority of patent cases. Justice Alito, writing for the 7-1 majority, found the application of laches to patent disputes incompatible with the...more

Miller & Martin PLLC

Be Aggressive, B-E Aggressive – SCOTUS Encourages IP Plaintiffs

Miller & Martin PLLC on

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court decided two much anticipated intellectual property cases. Supreme Court Rejects Laches in Patent Infringement Cases - The first, SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag et al. v. First Quality...more

McDermott Will & Emery

US Supreme Court Knocks out the Equitable Defense of Laches in Patent Law

McDermott Will & Emery on

The Supreme Court of the United States in SCA Hygiene Prods. Aktiebolag, et al. v. First Quality Baby Prods., LLC, et al., has held that the equitable defense of laches is no longer a valid defense to patent damages claims...more

Jones Day

Supreme Court Curbs Laches as a Defense in Patent Cases

Jones Day on

In SCA Hygiene Products v. First Quality Baby Products, decided on March 21, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court significantly reduced the role of the laches defense in patent actions: "Laches cannot be interposed as a defense...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Supreme Court Eliminates the Laches Defense in Patent Cases

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

The Supreme Court held that laches is no longer a defense against patent infringement. The Patent Act’s six-year statute of limitations already limits the window for damages for infringement, which precludes any further...more

Knobbe Martens

U.S. Supreme Court Eliminates Laches Defense for Damages in Patent Suits

Knobbe Martens on

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday, March 21, 2017, held in a 7-1 decision that the defense of laches is not available under the Patent Act to bar claims for damages. SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby...more

Stoel Rives LLP

The Fate of Patent Laches: SOL

Stoel Rives LLP on

On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court abolished a decades-old rule that allowed for application of the equitable defense of laches in patent cases. Until now, patent owners were required to justify filing suit after a period of...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

U.S. Supreme Court Diminishes Laches Defense in Patent Infringement Cases

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on

On March 21, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that "laches" is not a defense to infringement during a statutory damages period set by Congress in SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC....more

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC

Supreme Court Decides the Equitable Defense of Laches is No Longer Valid in Patent Cases

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC on

The Supreme Court’s recent ruling in SCA Hygiene v. First Quality, has eliminated the long-standing principle of laches in patent cases. On March 21, 2017, in an opinion written by Justice Alito, the Court held that laches...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

The Supreme Court Wipes Clean the Laches Defense in Certain Patent Cases

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on

On March 21, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 7-1 decision in SCA Hygiene Prods. Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Prods., LLC, wiping out the equitable defense of laches in some patent cases. In particular, where patent...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

"In SCA Hygiene, Supreme Court Rules Laches Not a Defense to Damages Within Statutory Period in Patent Cases"

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

In a 7-1 decision issued on March 21, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court held in SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC that laches cannot be invoked as a defense against a claim for damages in a patent...more

Lathrop GPM

Laches No Longer a Defense to Pre-Suit Damages in Patent Infringement Cases

Lathrop GPM on

On March 21, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a highly anticipated 7-1 decision, held that laches cannot be invoked as a defense against damages for patent infringement occurring within the six-year damages limitation period...more

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

The Supreme Court Strikes Down Laches as a Defense to Patent Infringement

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP on

Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion, SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC, in which it held that laches cannot be used as a defense to a claim of patent infringement. The opinion had...more

48 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide