FEC Authorizes Federal Candidates and Officeholders to Solicit Unlimited Funds for State Ballot Initiative Committees

At the FEC’s May 1 open meeting, the Commission voted 4-1 to approve a draft advisory opinion requested by Nevadans for Reproductive Freedom (“NFRF”) that authorizes federal candidates and officeholders to solicit unlimited funds, at any time, from individuals, corporations, labor unions, and other organizations for state ballot initiative committees. NFRF is a 501(c)(4) tax-exempt nonprofit organization that is also registered as a state ballot committee in Nevada, and is currently gathering signatures to qualify a state ballot initiative for the 2024 general election. NFRF sought FEC approval for federal candidates and officeholders to solicit funds on behalf of NFRF outside of the federal amount limitations and source prohibitions.

By voting to approve this request, the FEC clarifies two decades of guidance concerning state ballot measure activity. In previous advisory opinions dating back to 2003, the FEC divided on the basic question of whether state ballot initiatives, measures, and referenda are “elections” for purposes of federal campaign finance law, and drew distinctions between ballot initiatives based on whether they had qualified for the ballot and whether federal candidate elections would appear on the same ballot. Now, with the approval of AO 2024-05, a majority of the FEC has declared that state ballot initiatives are not “elections” under federal campaign finance law because that term refers only to candidate elections. In addition, the distinction between a ballot measure’s pre- and post-qualification period has been eliminated.

Going forward, federal candidates and officeholders may make solicitations for state ballot initiative committees without regard to the “soft money” restrictions regardless of whether a ballot initiative has qualified for the ballot or a federal candidate election will appear on the same ballot. Note, however, that any applicable state restrictions on ballot measure committee funding, such as state laws prohibiting foreign national contributions, still apply. In addition, it is important to remember that Members of Congress are subject to U.S. House and Senate Ethics Committee restrictions and preapproval for making solicitations for a Section 501(c)(4) organization may be required. Federal candidates and officeholders should continue to consult experienced counsel before soliciting any funds for a state ballot measure committee.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Holtzman Vogel Baran Torchinsky & Josefiak | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Holtzman Vogel Baran Torchinsky & Josefiak
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Holtzman Vogel Baran Torchinsky & Josefiak on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide